Bunge Ltd

Overall approach

8/10
- Overarching commitment on deforestation
  
  4/4
  
  Overall commitment
  
  Conversion-free/zero-gross conversion/zero-net conversion commitment or a zero deforestation/deforestation-free commitment that explicitly includes all other natural ecosystems
  
  4/4
  
  Do they have a commitment for other non-Forest 500 commodities, if so which?: NA
  
  "Our commitment to be free of deforestation and native vegetation conversion in our value chains in 2025 is a central part of our business strategy and planning – and is a crucial element of our climate action plan. Bunge is unique among our peers in that we will apply this policy across all our value chains, for direct and indirect sourcing, and have been reporting our progress for several years."
  
  Open source document
- Signatory to an initiative tackling deforestation
  
  1/1
  
  Signatory
  
  Yes
  
  1/1
  
  If Other Initiative, specify: SoyPlus, Fefac Guidelines; Agroideal.org
  
  Which initiatives?: Soy Moratorium; Tropical Forest Alliance 2020 partner; UN Global Compact; Other initiative
  
  "Bunge states in their CDP report for 2021 that they are a member of the following initiatives; "UN Global Compact / Tropical Forest Alliance 2020 (TFA) / Cerrado Working Group (GTC) / Roundtable on Sustainable Soy (RTRS) / Sustainable Agricultural Initiative (SAI) / SoyPlus, Fefac Guidelines; Agroideal.org."
  
  Open source document
- Awareness of the value of forests
  
  1/1
  
  Awareness
  
  Yes
  
  1/1
  
  "We deliver palm oil that is produced in accordance with NDPE practices, which guide not only our approach but also help support our customers to deliver on their commitments for: NO DEFORESTATION, which refers to no deforestation when developing land, identifying and protecting High Conservation Value (HCV) areas and High Carbon Stock (HCS) areas, a no-burning policy and the reduction of GHG emissions."
  
  Open source document
- Deforestation as a business risk
  
  1/1
  
  Business risk
  
  Yes
  
  1/1
  
  What type of risk is recognised?: Reputational
  
  What revenue comes from industries relevant to each forest risk commodity?: NA
  
  What proportion of revenue that comes from relevant industries is exposed to each forest risk commodity?: NA
  
  "Reputational risks are always included in Bunge's annual assessments. Due to our global presence in key agricultural markets with known impacts on the environment, Bunge places high priority on compliance with national and local regulation to protect at-risk ecosystems, such as our commitment to zero deforestation and protection of HCV and HCS areas when applicable, i.e. mapped in a given ecosystem. A significant reputational risk identified in the last year was related to the rise in fires used for clearing land in the Amazon Biome. Although in some cases legally permitted, Bunge nevertheless opposes the use of fire to clear land. Furthermore, as a signatory to the Amazon Soy Moratorium, Bunge does not purchase from newly deforested lands after July 2008. The situation in the region created significant reputational risk, as Bunge is a leading supplier of Brazil-based soy and could therefore be erroneously labeled as a driver of the deforestation."
  
  Open source document
- High-level management of deforestion
  
  1/1
  
  High-level management
  
  Yes
  
  1/1
  
  How often does the committee or board meet to assess company's progress on addressing deforestation-related issues?: Quarterly
  
  Which commodities does it apply to?: Palm oil; Soy
  
  Bunge reports in their 2021 CDP report that: "Is there board-level oversight of forests-related issues within your organization? Yes [...] Director on board Oversees commitments and strategy for company level compliance with policies and activities, Board-level committee Committee at board level dedicated to Sustainability, supporting policies and discussing strategies. Also, following up with policy implementation."
  
  Open source document
- Executive compensation linked to deforestation
  
  Executive compensation
  
  Yes, for all commodities
  
  0/0
  
  Does it disclose the percentage of pay at risk?: No
  
  The implementation of deforestation free supply chains are incorporated in the compensation metrics for the whole company.
  
  Open source document
- Target to reduce emissions from land-use change
  
  0/1
- Reporting on emissions from land-use change
  
  0/1
- Disclosure of conservation activity
- Disclosure of reforestation activity
- Target to reduce emissions in scope 1/2
  
  Reduce emissions
  
  Yes
  
  0/0
  
  Type of climate target: Other or unclear
  
  Is this target aligned with/verified by SBTi?: Yes
  
  What is the target date for the company to achieve their climate target?: 2030
  
  Our Targets: Scope 1 & 2 25% reduction by 2030 "In 2021, we were proud to announce ambitious climate action and emissions reduction targets, made possible by our existing work and our ambitions for a more sustainable agribusiness and food system. Our targets are validated by the globally recognized Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi), highlighting our commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions within our operations and throughout our supply chains."
  
  Open source document
Commodity score

35/90
- Soy
  
  43/90
  - Commitment Strength
    
    14/17
    - Commodity-specific deforestation commitment
      
      9/9.5
      - Commitment details
        Zero-gross conversion
        
        6/6
        
        Commodity-specific deforestation commitment
        
        Zero-gross conversion
        
        6/6
        
        Which certification schemes are used?: RTRS
        
        When was this commitment set?: 2020
        
        Does the company commitment also explicitly apply to hidden/indirect soy?: Yes
        
        "Our commitment to be free of deforestation and native vegetation conversion in our value chains in 2025 is a central part of our business strategy and planning – and is a crucial element of our climate action plan [...] Apply our commitment to all native vegetation conversion in the relevant geographies • Protect the Amazon by complying with the Soy Moratorium • Directly engage with farmers to promote our commitment and sustainable agriculture • Provide innovative tools and incentives to farmers that enable sustainable expansion • Offer our traceability and monitoring technology to third-party resellers • Seek compensation for farmers for their conservation efforts"
        
        Open source document
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        Yes
        
        2/2
        
        Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        
        Yes
        
        2/2
        
        What subsidiaries are explicitly excluded?: NA
        
        What is the rationale for any exclusions?: NA
        
        What subsidiaries are explicitly included?: NA
        
        What percentage of commodity production/sourcing is excluded?: NA
        
        "Our commitment to be free of deforestation and native vegetation conversion in our value chains in 2025 is a central part of our business strategy and planning – and is a crucial element of our climate action plan [...] Apply our commitment to all native vegetation conversion in the relevant geographies • Protect the Amazon by complying with the Soy Moratorium • Directly engage with farmers to promote our commitment and sustainable agriculture • Provide innovative tools and incentives to farmers that enable sustainable expansion • Offer our traceability and monitoring technology to third-party resellers • Seek compensation for farmers for their conservation efforts [...] Bunge’s non-deforestation commitment – reaching deforestation-free value chains in 2025 – is especially important to priority regions in South America where deforestation is a higher risk. This is where we apply our strategy and resources, and where the implementation of our commitment for soy will be focused, covering states and municipalities that encompass the savannahlike areas of the Brazilian Cerrado and the Gran Chaco of Argentina and Paraguay"
        
        Open source document
      - Target date
        2025
        
        0.8/1
        
        Target date
        
        2025
        
        0.8/1
        
        What actions or steps are identified for time-bound implementation?: NA
        
        "Our commitment to be free of deforestation and native vegetation conversion in our value chains in 2025 is a central part of our business strategy and planning – and is a crucial element of our climate action plan [...] Apply our commitment to all native vegetation conversion in the relevant geographies • Protect the Amazon by complying with the Soy Moratorium • Directly engage with farmers to promote our commitment and sustainable agriculture • Provide innovative tools and incentives to farmers that enable sustainable expansion • Offer our traceability and monitoring technology to third-party resellers • Seek compensation for farmers for their conservation efforts"
        
        Open source document
      - Interim target date
        No
        
        0/0.5
    - Commitment to a traceable supply chain
      
      5/7.5
      - Commitment details
        Traces to Point of production
        
        4/4
        
        Commitment to a traceable supply chain
        
        Traces to Point of production
        
        4/4
        
        When was this commitment set?: 2020
        
        "As part of our 2025 implementation plan, we are: Building full traceability to farm for direct (farms we purchase commodities from) and indirect sources (farms that sell to resellers from whom we purchase). By using cutting edge satellite monitoring and leveraging our strong relationships with farmers, we can identify changes in land use and soy planting on over 12,000 farms we have mapped and monitored to date. Transparently disclosing key performance indicators related to our supply chain, traceability, monitoring, supplier engagement and non-compliance 2021 100% Traceability to direct sources in Brazil*, Argentina & Paraguay** Cerrado regions of Mato Grosso and MATOPIBA region (Maranhao, Tocantins, Piaui and Bahia states) ** Chaco regions of Argentina and Paraguay. Bunge expects to achieve full traceability to farm for indirect sources in the high-priority regions of South America by the end of 2024, an important enabler for the implementation of our 2025 commitment. Third party verification of direct & indirect traceability data for Brazil – Achieved. The Amazon biome is another important ecosystem, but is covered by the Amazon Soy Moratorium, to which Bunge is a signatory."
        
        Open source document
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        No
        
        0/2
        
        Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        
        No
        
        0/2
        
        If no, what is excluded?: Location
        
        What is the rationale for any exclusions?: NA
        
        What percentage of commodity production/sourcing is excluded?: NA
        
        What subsidiaries are explicitly excluded?: NA
        
        What subsidiaries are explicitly included?: Brazil (Mato Grosso and MATOPIBA region (Maranhao, Tocantins, Piaui and Bahia states)) Argentina and Paraguay
        
        "As part of our 2025 implementation plan, we are: Building full traceability to farm for direct (farms we purchase commodities from) and indirect sources (farms that sell to resellers from whom we purchase). By using cutting edge satellite monitoring and leveraging our strong relationships with farmers, we can identify changes in land use and soy planting on over 12,000 farms we have mapped and monitored to date. Transparently disclosing key performance indicators related to our supply chain, traceability, monitoring, supplier engagement and non-compliance 2021 100% Traceability to direct sources in Brazil*, Argentina & Paraguay** Cerrado regions of Mato Grosso and MATOPIBA region (Maranhao, Tocantins, Piaui and Bahia states) ** Chaco regions of Argentina and Paraguay. Bunge expects to achieve full traceability to farm for indirect sources in the high-priority regions of South America by the end of 2024, an important enabler for the implementation of our 2025 commitment. Third party verification of direct & indirect traceability data for Brazil – Achieved. The Amazon biome is another important ecosystem, but is covered by the Amazon Soy Moratorium, to which Bunge is a signatory. Learn more about the Moratorium on page 40.""
        
        Open source document
      - Target date
        2024
        
        0.9/1
        
        Target date
        
        2024
        
        0.9/1
        
        What actions or steps are identified for time-bound implementation?: NA
        
        "Bunge expects to achieve full traceability to farm for indirect sources in the high-priority regions of South America by the end of 2024, an important enabler for the implementation of our 2025 commitment."
        
        Open source document
      - Interim target date
        Yes
        
        0.5/0.5
        
        Interim target date
        
        Yes
        
        0.5/0.5
        
        What date is given for the interim milestone?: 2021
        
        "In 2021, Bunge also began receiving third party verification of our traceability to farm, offering another layer of assurance. For indirect purchases, the company is 100% traceable to third party elevators in the monitored regions since 2018."; "Our monitoring covers 96% of the volume of soybeans we buy directly, and even includes monitored farms that we no longer buy from. Our intermediate target is to achieve 98% of monitored volumes in the Cerrado, based on CAR/GPS data by the end of December 2021."[...]"Third party verification of direct & indirect traceability data for Brazil – Achieved"
        
        Open source document
        Open source document
  - Associated Human Rights Abuses
    
    7/17
    - Labour rights in the supply chain
      Yes
      
      3/3
      
      Labour rights in the supply chain
      
      Yes
      
      3/3
      
      Details of commitment: Discrimination; Forced labour; Child labour; Freedom of association
      
      How far back in the supply chain does this commitment apply?: Tier 1
      
      "Beyond our own walls, we strive to root out all cases of human rights abuses in our value chains by upholding strict standards of compliance, from local and internationally-recognized conventions, to projects and activities that identify and eliminate cases of abuse. Our operations, employees, and third party contractors must comply with all applicable local laws, rules and regulations, as well as our company Code of Conduct. - Eliminating all forms of forced and child labor...Harassment, discrimination and abuse...Freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining...We require that our suppliers’ operations, and those of their subcontractors and suppliers, comply with Bunge’s global labor policy, as well as our Code of Conduct."
      
      Open source document
    - Inclusion of small-scale farmers
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      Inclusion of small-scale farmers
      
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      How many smallholders do they support, and what percentage does this represent in terms of their sourcing from smallholders?: NA
      
      If other, specify: Promote smallholder inclusion
      
      What is the nature of that support?: Other
      
      "Brazilian Seal of Social Fuel (Selo Combustível Social) – We are part of the National Biodiesel Production Program, an initiative of the Brazilian Federal Government, to promote the qualified insertion of smallholders into the biodiesel production chain."
      
      Open source document
    - Gender equality in the supply chain
      No commitment
      
      0/2
    - Commitment to remediation
      No
      
      0/1
    - Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed Consent
      Yes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions
      
      2/3
      
      Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed Consent
      
      Yes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions
      
      2/3
      
      How far back in the supply chain does this commitment apply?: Tier 1
      
      "In our grains & oilseeds value chains, Bunge commits to: respect human rights and indigenous community rights, and apply free, prior and informed consent for land purchases and use"
      
      Open source document
    - Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territory
      No
      
      0/3
    - Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threats
      No
      
      0/3
  - Implementation and Reporting
    
    22/56
    - Reporting proportion of compliant volumes
      
      0/0
    - Reporting is independently verified
      Yes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme
      
      2/2
      
      Reporting is independently verified
      
      Yes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme
      
      2/2
      
      Is the performance of compliance of some suppliers, sources, or origins not verified, and if so why not?: NA
      
      What methods are used for verification?: AceTrack ; AgroIdeal
      
      Which processes or groups does the company use for third party verification?: AceTrack ; AgroIdeal
      
      What percent of the company's supply volume is verified using company verification systems?: NA
      
      Which tools, approaches, third-party verification, including certification, schemes are used?: AceTrack ; AgroIdeal
      
      For what percent of the company's supply volume is third-party verification of performance relative to commitments conducted?: NA
      
      "We use farm monitoring systems hosted by an independent third party as a complementary way to check public databases in specific regions in Brazil in order to assess the socio-environmental compliance criteria of landowners and rural properties, as well as ensuring land clearing complies with the legal requirements for land preservation. • We develop our own monitoring and verification systems, such as AceTrack. Through this technology, Bunge provides customers with traceability and product origin details. • We leverage Agroideal.org, an open-source tool developed with a coalition of 17 other organizations connected to the value chain in order to assess open land available for the expansion of soybean, mitigating the risk of indirect pressure for native vegetation conversion"
      
      Open source document
    - Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
      Yes, encouraged
      
      0/3
      
      Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
      
      Yes, encouraged
      
      0/3
      
      "Environment Our policies and commitments related to non-deforestation, biodiversity, environment and other related approaches are built into our strategy, operations and investments. Compliance with all applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations is a minimum standard by which we hold our employees and contractors accountable. Supplier relationships We require that our suppliers’ operations, and those of their subcontractors and suppliers, comply with Bunge’s global labor policy, as well as our Code of Conduct. In addition, any housing that they, their subcontractors or suppliers provide for their employees, must be safe and healthy."
      
      Open source document
    - Deforestation cut off date
      No
      
      0/2
    - Collaborative actions
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      Collaborative actions
      
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      What is the nature of that participation?: Attending & contributing to meetings; Providing support/ advice/ experience/ expertise; Providing technical capacity
      
      What initiatives does the company participate in?: Bunge Sustainable Partnership
      
      "Since 2020, Bunge has been engaging resellers to help them build their traceability and monitoring systems. Additionally, in 2021 Bunge launched the Bunge Sustainable Partnership program which builds on the successes made over the previous year by allowing resellers to utilize our technology, training and experience. Together with the Partnership program, we are gaining enhanced visibility into our indirect supply. Due to the strength of the Partnership program, we can currently monitor around 64% of the indirect volumes that go to resellers in the priority regions, with a goal of 100% before 2025. "
      
      Open source document
    - Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land use
      No
      
      0/2
    - Risk assessments for forest risk
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      Risk assessments for forest risk
      
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      For what percentage of material produced or sourced by the company has forest risk been assessed?: NA
      
      How frequently are assessments conducted?: NA
      
      "Does your organization undertake a forests-related risk assessment? Yes, forests-related risks are assessed"[...]"This will include a review of the potential supplier’s feedback on Bunge’s policy commitments and our request for relevant permits, legal licenses and concession maps (in shapefile format and where legally possible) for the potential supplier’s entire operations, as well as environmental impact assessments and HCS and HCV studies."
      
      Open source document
      Open source document
    - Operations assessed to comply with law
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      Operations assessed to comply with law
      
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      "In its grain purchase process in Brazil, the Company uses daily consultations of IBAMA's public list of embargoes (illegal deforestation) as well as the list of the Labor Inspection Secretariat (forced labor analogous to slavery)"
      
      Open source document
    - Accessible grievance mechanism
      No
      
      0/4
    - Report volumes of commodity sourced/used
      Reporting partial volumes
      
      2/3
      
      Report volumes of commodity sourced/used
      
      Reporting partial volumes
      
      1.5/3
      
      Reporting certified/compliant volume: 50000 Metric Tonnes
      
      Reporting non-certified/non-compliant volume: 16950000 Metric Tons
      
      Total volume: 17,000,000 Metric Tons
      
      What is the non-DCF commodity volume sourced from known production areas, and proportion of total supply chain volume this represents?: NA
      
      What product types/sectors is this in?: NA
      
      Bunge publish in their CDP 2021 Forests report that 17000000 metric tons of soy makes up a partial proportion of their soy consumption.
      
      Open source document
    - Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPIC
      Yes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains
      
      3/5
      
      Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPIC
      
      Yes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains
      
      2.5/5
      
      What percentage/number of new interests, developments, or expansions has the company used FPIC to secure consent of indigenous peoples/local communities?: NA
      
      What steps has the company taken to implement their labour rights commitment?: "We began reviewing palm oil suppliers for labor risks and practices in 2017; however, we have been conducting reviews among grain suppliers in risky areas for a much longer time. In Brazil, we are a signatory of the National Slave Work Eradication Pact developed by the Ethos Institute and the International Labour Organization (ILO) and endorsed by the Brazilian government, civil society and other companies. We cross-reference our commercial systems to government forced-labor databases and block any contracts with listed entities. "
      
      What is the status of those FPIC processes?: NA
      
      "In those regions or sectors where the risks of violation of our policy are higher, we have implemented a variety of policies and procedures to ensure compliance. We began reviewing palm oil suppliers for labor risks and practices in 2017; however, we have been conducting reviews among grain suppliers in risky areas for a much longer time. In Brazil, we are a signatory of the National Slave Work Eradication Pact developed by the Ethos Institute and the International Labour Organization (ILO) and endorsed by the Brazilian government, civil society and other companies. We cross-reference our commercial systems to government forced-labor databases and block any contracts with listed entities. In 2018, a total of 10 suppliers were disqualified for being on the Ministry of Labor’s forced-labor blacklist, out of approximately 8,500 suppliers that had been screened over the year."
      
      Open source document
    - Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rights
      No
      
      0/5
    - Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisition
      Yes
      
      4/4
      
      Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisition
      
      Yes
      
      4/4
      
      How does the company remedy adverse social and environmental impacts linked to their operations and/or supply chains?: NA
      
      For what percentage of production units has an ESIA been carried out as part of the land use planning process?: NA
      
      "Bunge has sponsored sustainable management efforts with tools such as Agroideal.org already in use in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agroideal.org helps users to analyze and evaluate socio-environmental risks for the region’s soy expansion."
      
      Open source document
    - Upstream: Reporting production/processing locations
      No disclosure
      
      0/4
      
      Upstream: Reporting production/processing locations
      
      No disclosure
      
      0/4
      
      What type of conservation designation and/or conservation status is used?: NA
      
      What is the volume of each forest risk commodity that the company produced/processed/sourced in the previous year from each national or subnational location?: NA
      
      What is the total land area owned, managed, or controlled by the company for the forest risk commodity?: NA
      
      What is the total area of land (in ha) that is available for future production, e.g. concessions?: NA
      
      What is the total area in production (in ha)?: NA
      
      For what percent are boundaries (of certified land holdings) disclosed?: NA
      
      For what percent are boundaries (of holdings under conservation) disclosed?: NA
      
      For what percent are point locations (of certified land holdings) disclosed?: NA
      
      From what sub-national jurisdiction(s) does the company source material?: NA
      
      In what country(ies) does the company operate and/or source material?: Argentina ; Brazil ; Paraguay ; Ukraine ; USA ; Canada
      
      In what jurisdiction(s)/subnational region does the company operate and/or source material?: Salta, Chaco, Tucuman
      
      What is the area, in hectares of production units, on which non-DCF commodities are produced or processed, by country and jurisdiction: NA
      
      What is the total area (in ha) of natural ecosystem on land owned, managed, or controlled by the company?: NA
      
      For what percent are point locations (of holdings under conservation) disclosed?: NA
      
      For what percent are boundaries disclosed?: NA
      
      For what percent are point locations (of land holdings and processing facilities) disclosed: NA
      
      What types of ecosystems are these?: NA
      
      NA
      
      Open source document
    - Downstream: Reporting suppliers
      No
      
      0/4
      
      Downstream: Reporting suppliers
      
      No
      
      0/4
      
      What is the volume of each forest risk commodity that the company sourced in the previous year from each national or subnational location?: NA
      
      What type of location data (boundary, point, etc.) is provided for smallholder farms?: NA
      
      Does the company disclose location of suppliers' production areas or primary processing sites?: No
      
      For what percent are boundaries disclosed?: NA
      
      For what percent is no location data disclosed?: NA
      
      For what percent of smallholder suppliers is location disclosed?: NA
      
      For what percent of suppliers' production areas are point locations disclosed?: NA
      
      From what country(ies) does the company source material?: Argentina ; Brazil ; Paraguay ; Ukraine ; USA ; Canada
      
      From what sub-national jurisdiction(s) does the company source material?: Salta, Chaco, Tucuman
      
      NA
      
      Open source document
    - Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processing
      Yes, using an internal verification system
      
      4/4
      
      Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processing
      
      Yes, using an internal verification system
      
      4/4
      
      Does the company use a certification system?: Yes
      
      What tools, processes, bodies carry out monitoring of the company's production or processing operations?: Satellite monitoring system
      
      If so, what jurisdictions and mechanisms does the company use?: NA
      
      How frequently is compliance assessed?: NA
      
      For what percentage of the commodity sourced by the company is deforestation/conversion monitored at the farm level on production units known to be in the company's supply chain?: NA
      
      For what percentage of suppliers does the company use/rely on external mechanisms to monitor compliance?: NA
      
      For what percentage of production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages, or otherwise controls does the company use external processes or actors, such as certification, to monitor compliance?: NA
      
      Does the company use a jurisdictional monitoring mechanism?: No
      
      "Building full traceability to farm for direct (farms we purchase commodities from) and indirect sources (farms that sell to resellers from whom we purchase). By using cuttingedge satellite monitoring and leveraging our strong relationships with farmers, we can identify changes in land use and soy planting on over 12,000 farms we have mapped and monitored to date"
      
      Open source document
    - Upstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
      No
      
      0/4
    - Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chain
      Yes, for its suppliers; Also for its suppliers production or primary processing operations in its supply chains
      
      3/4
      
      Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chain
      
      Yes, for its suppliers; Also for its suppliers production or primary processing operations in its supply chains
      
      3/4
      
      For what percentage of the commodity sourced by the company is deforestation/conversion monitored at the farm level on production units known to be in the company's supply chain?: NA
      
      For what percent of suppliers does the company directly monitor compliance of production or processing operations?: NA
      
      How frequently is compliance assessed?: 'Regularly'
      
      How is compliance monitored?: Internal monitoring and verification systems
      
      What percentage of the company's supply chain volume does that represent?: NA
      
      For what percentage of suppliers does the company use/rely on external mechanisms to monitor compliance?: NA
      
      "Bunge will implement a supplier management protocol to prioritize engagement and address noncompliance. Farms showing deforestation will be “yellow” flagged for further monitoring. Farms showing soy planting on deforested areas will be “red” flagged for engagement. Bunge will maintain regular communication about its deforestation-free commitment and activities with suppliers. We will engage with flagged farmers, as well as third party suppliers, to determine potential paths forward for meeting our requirements. Starting in 2018, Bunge has suspended farms that have not engaged adequately. Starting in 2020, Bunge will suspend farms considering engagement, environmental and other factors in line with our goal of progressive reduction."
      
      Open source document
    - Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
      No
      
      0/4
    - Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
      Engage with suppliers but with no time-bound threat of exclusion
      
      1/2
      
      Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
      
      Engage with suppliers but with no time-bound threat of exclusion
      
      1/2
      
      Does the company work with the non-compliant supplier to develop an implementation plan to remedy associated harms or non-compliance?: No
      
      What type of support does the company offer to its suppliers to help them achieve compliance with commitments?: NA
      
      What criteria does the policy specify for blacklisting or exclusion?: NA
      
      Does the company commit to engage with rightsholders, Indigenous peoples and local communities when developing the implementation plan?: No
      
      Does the company engage non-compliant indirect suppliers in order to address and remedy non-compliance?: No
      
      "Bunge will maintain regular communication about its deforestation-free commitment and activities with suppliers. We will engage with flagged farmers, as well as third party suppliers, to determine potential paths forward for meeting our requirements. Starting in 2018, Bunge has suspended farms that have not engaged adequately. Starting in 2020, Bunge will suspend farms considering engagement, environmental and other factors in line with our goal of progressive reduction. [...] Bunge will engage openly and productively with stakeholders, and advocate as a company for common solutions that improve the sustainability of agricultural value chains broadly."
      
      Open source document
    - Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliers
      Yes, excluded
      
      1/2
      
      Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliers
      
      Yes, excluded
      
      1/2
      
      How many noncompliant producers or suppliers are engaged through improvement plans or other processes, and what percentage of the company's supply chain volume does that represent?: NA
      
      Does the company have a list of blacklisted or otherwise excluded suppliers or producers?: No
      
      Bunge reported the number of blocked suppliers in Brazil n their 9th non-deforestation progress report.
      
      Open source document
- Palm oil *
  
  48/90
  - Commitment Strength
    
    16/17
    - Commodity-specific deforestation commitment
      
      9/9.5
      - Commitment details
        Zero-gross conversion
        
        6/6
        
        Commodity-specific deforestation commitment
        
        Zero-gross conversion
        
        6/6
        
        Does the company have a commitment to the protection of other specific named ecosystems?: HCS; Peat
        
        When was this commitment set?: 2020
        
        Which certification schemes are used?: RSPO
        
        If other certification, specify: ISCC
        
        "Our commitment to be free of deforestation and native vegetation conversion in our value chains in 2025 is a central part of our business strategy and planning – and is a crucial element of our climate action plan"[...]"We deliver palm oil that is produced in accordance with NDPE practices, which guide not only our approach but also help support our customers to deliver on their commitments for: NO DEFORESTATION, which refers to no deforestation when developing land, identifying and protecting High Conservation Value (HCV) areas and High Carbon Stock (HCS) areas, a no-burning policy and the reduction of GHG emissions. NO PEAT, which refers to no new developments on peatland and encourages the use of best management practices on existing plantations on peat. Where possible, peat restoration is also implemented."[...]"Each year we certify or verify the sustainability of greater volumes of our palm. In 2021, 87% of our palm oil volumes were sourced from suppliers with robust NDPE commitments. Below are our palm certification standards: RSPO ; ISCC"
        
        Open source document
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        Yes
        
        2/2
        
        Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        
        Yes
        
        2/2
        
        "Our commitment to be free of deforestation and native vegetation conversion in our value chains in 2025 is a central part of our business strategy and planning – and is a crucial element of our climate action plan"[...]"We deliver palm oil that is produced in accordance with NDPE practices, which guide not only our approach but also help support our customers to deliver on their commitments for: NO DEFORESTATION, which refers to no deforestation when developing land, identifying and protecting High Conservation Value (HCV) areas and High Carbon Stock (HCS) areas, a no-burning policy and the reduction of GHG emissions. NO PEAT, which refers to no new developments on peatland and encourages the use of best management practices on existing plantations on peat. Where possible, peat restoration is also implemented."[...]"Each year we certify or verify the sustainability of greater volumes of our palm. In 2021, 87% of our palm oil volumes were sourced from suppliers with robust NDPE commitments. Below are our palm certification standards: RSPO ; ISCC"
        
        Open source document
      - Target date
        2025
        
        0.8/1
        
        Target date
        
        2025
        
        0.8/1
        
        What actions or steps are identified for time-bound implementation?: Certification ; source only from suppliers with NDPE policies.
        
        "Our commitment to be free of deforestation and native vegetation conversion in our value chains in 2025 is a central part of our business strategy and planning – and is a crucial element of our climate action plan"[...]"We deliver palm oil that is produced in accordance with NDPE practices, which guide not only our approach but also help support our customers to deliver on their commitments for: NO DEFORESTATION, which refers to no deforestation when developing land, identifying and protecting High Conservation Value (HCV) areas and High Carbon Stock (HCS) areas, a no-burning policy and the reduction of GHG emissions. NO PEAT, which refers to no new developments on peatland and encourages the use of best management practices on existing plantations on peat. Where possible, peat restoration is also implemented."[...]"Each year we certify or verify the sustainability of greater volumes of our palm. In 2021, 87% of our palm oil volumes were sourced from suppliers with robust NDPE commitments. Below are our palm certification standards: RSPO ; ISCC"
        
        Open source document
      - Interim target date
        No
        
        0/0.5
        
        Interim target date
        
        No
        
        0/0.5
        
        "Our commitment to be free of deforestation and native vegetation conversion in our value chains in 2025 is a central part of our business strategy and planning – and is a crucial element of our climate action plan"[...]"We deliver palm oil that is produced in accordance with NDPE practices, which guide not only our approach but also help support our customers to deliver on their commitments for: NO DEFORESTATION, which refers to no deforestation when developing land, identifying and protecting High Conservation Value (HCV) areas and High Carbon Stock (HCS) areas, a no-burning policy and the reduction of GHG emissions. NO PEAT, which refers to no new developments on peatland and encourages the use of best management practices on existing plantations on peat. Where possible, peat restoration is also implemented."[...]"Each year we certify or verify the sustainability of greater volumes of our palm. In 2021, 87% of our palm oil volumes were sourced from suppliers with robust NDPE commitments. Below are our palm certification standards: RSPO ; ISCC"
        
        Open source document
    - Commitment to a traceable supply chain
      
      7/7.5
      - Commitment details
        Traces to Point of production
        
        4/4
        
        Commitment to a traceable supply chain
        
        Traces to Point of production
        
        4/4
        
        When was this commitment set?: 2014
        
        "TraceabilityBunge will strive for traceability to the mill level for all suppliers and, in areas of high environmental or social sensitivity, to the fresh fruit bunch level.Implementation & TransparencyStarting immediately, Bunge will collaborate with suppliers and other relevant stakeholders to develop time-bound implementation plans, and to move toward 100 percent implementation of the above commitments.In addition to our RSPO ACOP, we will issue, at least once per year, public reports detailing our time-bound plans and progress toward full implementation."
        
        Open source document
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        Yes
        
        2/2
        
        Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        
        Yes
        
        2/2
        
        What subsidiaries are explicitly included?: NA
        
        What subsidiaries are explicitly excluded?: NA
        
        What percentage of commodity production/sourcing is excluded?: 100%
        
        What is the rationale for any exclusions?: NA
        
        "TraceabilityBunge will strive for traceability to the mill level for all suppliers and, in areas of high environmental or social sensitivity, to the fresh fruit bunch level.Implementation & TransparencyStarting immediately, Bunge will collaborate with suppliers and other relevant stakeholders to develop time-bound implementation plans, and to move toward 100 percent implementation of the above commitments.In addition to our RSPO ACOP, we will issue, at least once per year, public reports detailing our time-bound plans and progress toward full implementation."
        
        Open source document
      - Target date
        2025
        
        0.8/1
        
        Target date
        
        2025
        
        0.8/1
        
        What actions or steps are identified for time-bound implementation?: NA
        
        Bunge have a 2025 target for 100% traceable to plantation level for palm oil.
        
        Open source document
      - Interim target date
        No
        
        0/0.5
  - Associated Human Rights Abuses
    
    9/17
    - Labour rights in the supply chain
      Yes
      
      3/3
      
      Labour rights in the supply chain
      
      Yes
      
      3/3
      
      Details of commitment: ILO; Discrimination; Forced labour; Child labour; Freedom of association
      
      How far back in the supply chain does this commitment apply?: Tier 1
      
      "Labor Protections, Human Rights and Free, Prior & Informed Consent (FPIC)Prohibition of forced and child labor, discrimination and harassment of workersProtection of freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining"[...]"Adoption of the UN International Labour Organization principles"
      
      Open source document
      Open source document
    - Inclusion of small-scale farmers
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      Inclusion of small-scale farmers
      
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      What is the nature of that support?: Technical assistance/support
      
      How many smallholders do they support, and what percentage does this represent in terms of their sourcing from smallholders?: NA
      
      "Our Commitment: • Educate smallholders about sustainable growing practices...Smallholders play a critical role in the palm oil supply chain: 40% of the total worldwide palm oil production is ultimately provided by smallholders. In 2018, Bunge Loders Croklaan, IOI Corporation Berhad, Kerry Group and Kilang Kelapa Sawit Fortuna Sdn Bhd (Fortuna Mill) started Program ILHAM, a three year palm oil smallholder support program. From providing trainings on best agricultural practices, to initiating socialization visits to distributing fertilizer, to performing foliar and soil sampling exercises, the program has led to a productive yield to the benefit of the smallholders. Earlier in 2021, a team conducted a foliar and soil resampling exercise in Kampung Basai, Beluran in Sabah, Malaysia alongside five farmers who were selected to monitor the progress of the program. We are encouraged by the results, which showed an improvement in the foliar and soil nutrient levels, and will explore additional opportunities to support smallholders in the years ahead."
      
      Open source document
    - Gender equality in the supply chain
      Commitment to ensure equality of women in the supply chain
      
      1/2
      
      Gender equality in the supply chain
      
      Commitment to ensure equality of women in the supply chain
      
      1/2
      
      "Provide fair and equal employment opportunities for all employees, regardless of race, nationality, religion or gender."
      
      Open source document
    - Commitment to remediation
      Yes
      
      1/1
      
      Commitment to remediation
      
      Yes
      
      0.5/1
      
      "Bunge will conduct appropriate due diligence to assess whether prospective suppliers have complied with our policy from February 2017, and if necessary to identify appropriate conservation / compensation / restoration measures to be carried out, prior to entering into any contracts"
      
      Open source document
    - Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed Consent
      Yes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions
      
      2/3
      
      Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed Consent
      
      Yes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions
      
      2/3
      
      How far back in the supply chain does this commitment apply?: Tier 1
      
      "Bunge announced an updated palm oil sourcing policy in October 2014 that details our commitment to build a traceable supply chain for all of the palm oil and derivatives we trade or utilize in our products, and which includes the following principles: Respect of local and indigenous community rights and application of FPIC for land purchases and use"
      
      Open source document
    - Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territory
      No
      
      0/3
    - Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threats
      No
      
      0/3
  - Implementation and Reporting
    
    24/56
    - Reporting proportion of compliant volumes
      
      0/0
    - Reporting is independently verified
      Yes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme
      
      1/2
      
      Reporting is independently verified
      
      Yes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme
      
      1/2
      
      Which processes or groups does the company use for third party verification?: RSPO Certification
      
      What percent of the company's supply volume is verified using company verification systems?: 35%
      
      What methods are used for verification?: RSPO Certification
      
      Is the performance of compliance of some suppliers, sources, or origins not verified, and if so why not?: NA
      
      For what percent of the company's supply volume is third-party verification of performance relative to commitments conducted?: NA
      
      Which tools, approaches, third-party verification, including certification, schemes are used?: RSPO Certification
      
      "Bunge has mapped its palm supply chain back to its origins. As part of our supplier due diligence process, suppliers are asked to provide detailed information in their sourcing base. We overlay this information with forest and peat maps, as well as maps of other key biodiversity areas. On a biweekly basis, we receive land use change alerts from Satelligence to detect if there is deforestation taking place. In 2018, 2019 and 2020, we actively monitored more than 30 million hectares of land. Through our in-depth knowledge of our suppliers and our collaboration with Earth Equalizer, we have the elements at hand to check for and act on instances of suspected deforestation."
      
      Open source document
      Open source document
    - Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
      Yes, encouraged
      
      0/3
      
      Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
      
      Yes, encouraged
      
      0/3
      
      "Environment Our policies and commitments related to non-deforestation, biodiversity, environment and other related approaches are built into our strategy, operations and investments. Compliance with all applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations is a minimum standard by which we hold our employees and contractors accountable. Supplier relationships We require that our suppliers’ operations, and those of their subcontractors and suppliers, comply with Bunge’s global labor policy, as well as our Code of Conduct. In addition, any housing that they, their subcontractors or suppliers provide for their employees, must be safe and healthy."
      
      Open source document
    - Deforestation cut off date
      Yes, for all sourcing regions/operations
      
      2/2
      
      Deforestation cut off date
      
      Yes, for all sourcing regions/operations
      
      2/2
      
      What cut-off date is specified?: 2017
      
      " Provide details on your public commitment(s), including the description of specific criteria, coverage, and actions. Cutoff date 2017"
      
      Open source document
    - Collaborative actions
      No
      
      0/2
    - Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land use
      No
      
      0/2
    - Risk assessments for forest risk
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      Risk assessments for forest risk
      
      Yes
      
      2/2
      
      For what percentage of material produced or sourced by the company has forest risk been assessed?: NA
      
      How frequently are assessments conducted?: NA
      
      "Does your organization undertake a forests-related risk assessment? Yes, forests-related risks are assessed"[...]"This will include a review of the potential supplier’s feedback on Bunge’s policy commitments and our request for relevant permits, legal licenses and concession maps (in shapefile format and where legally possible) for the potential supplier’s entire operations, as well as environmental impact assessments and HCS and HCV studies."
      
      Open source document
      Open source document
    - Operations assessed to comply with law
      No
      
      0/2
    - Accessible grievance mechanism
      Yes, publicly accessible grievance mechanism
      
      2/4
      
      Accessible grievance mechanism
      
      Yes, publicly accessible grievance mechanism
      
      2/4
      
      Which issues does the grievance mechanism cover?: Social; Environmental
      
      What is the nature of the grievance mechanism used by the company?: Own mechanism
      
      "This procedure is a reference for management and staff of Bunge to handle grievances from any external parties, including individuals, government organizations and non-governmental organizations concerning the implementation of the Policy. Bunge recognises that feedback and input from stakeholders is valuable because it helps to enhance transparency in our supply chain and provides a means to gauge progress on the implementation of the Policy. In this respect, the Grievance Procedure favours open and inclusive dialogues with stakeholders. Bunge will adapt the procedure as it is operationalized in order to build a stronger Grievance Procedure over time. Bunge’s Policy and this Grievance Procedure apply to all worldwide operations and all thirdparty suppliers."
      
      Open source document
    - Report volumes of commodity sourced/used
      Reporting total volume
      
      3/3
      
      Report volumes of commodity sourced/used
      
      Reporting total volume
      
      3/3
      
      Reporting non-certified/non-compliant volume: 1256266.55 Metric Tons
      
      Total volume: 1933596 Metric Tonnes
      
      What product types/sectors is this in?: Food Processing
      
      What is the non-DCF commodity volume sourced from known production areas, and proportion of total supply chain volume this represents?: NA
      
      Reporting certified/compliant volume: 677329.45 Metric Tons
      
      Bunge report in their 2020 RSPO ACOP report a total volume of palm oil of 1933596 Metric Tonnes with 677329.45 Metric Tons or 35% of that volume being RSPO certified.
      
      Open source document
    - Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPIC
      Yes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains
      
      3/5
      
      Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPIC
      
      Yes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains
      
      2.5/5
      
      What is the status of those FPIC processes?: NA
      
      What percentage/number of new interests, developments, or expansions has the company used FPIC to secure consent of indigenous peoples/local communities?: NA
      
      What steps has the company taken to implement their labour rights commitment?: Collaborate with national bodies to identify and rectify potential cases of slave labour and via their Kuala Lumpur sustainability team identify ways to implement best practice on labour rights
      
      "In those regions or sectors where the risks of violation of our policy are higher, we have implemented a variety of policies and procedures to ensure compliance. We began reviewing palm oil suppliers for labor risks and practices in 2017; however, we have been conducting reviews among grain suppliers in risky areas for a much longer time. In Brazil, we are a signatory of the National Slave Work Eradication Pact developed by the Ethos Institute and the International Labour Organization (ILO) and endorsed by the Brazilian government, civil society and other companies. We cross-reference our commercial systems to government forced-labor databases and block any contracts with listed entities. In 2018, a total of 10 suppliers were disqualified for being on the Ministry of Labor’s forced-labor blacklist, out of approximately 8,500 suppliers that had been screened over the year." [...]"Our Kuala-Lumpur-based sustainability team has started to implement and verify best practices for labor in palm oil supply in Peninsular Malaysia. Key focus areas are: no passport retention, payment of minimum wages, and no payment of recruitment fees by foreign laborers. "
      
      Open source document
    - Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rights
      No
      
      0/5
    - Downstream: Reporting suppliers
      Yes, report direct suppliers
      
      2/4
      
      Downstream: Reporting suppliers
      
      Yes, report direct suppliers
      
      2/4
      
      For what percent of smallholder suppliers is location disclosed?: NA
      
      For what percent of suppliers' production areas are point locations disclosed?: 100%
      
      From what country(ies) does the company source material?: Brazil Colombia Côte d'Ivoire Ecuador Guatemala Honduras India Indonesia Malaysia Nicaragua Thailand
      
      From what sub-national jurisdiction(s) does the company source material?: Abidjan Meta Chiapas Pará Aceh Sumatera Barat Puntarenas Cesar Chiriquí Melaka Milne Bay Krabi Magdalena Tamil Nadu Atlántida Sumatera Utara Sarawak Kedah Surat Thani Sulawesi Tengah Bangka-Belitung Kalimantan Selatan Sumatera Selatan Kalimantan Tengah Jambi Perak Johor Sabah Riau Kalimantan Barat Bengkulu Pahang Kalimantan Timur Colón Kalimantan Utara Campeche Nakhon Si Thammarat Antioquia Alta Verapaz Cortés Quezaltenango Ucayali Petén Trengganu Guadalcanal Andhra Pradesh Manabi Izabal Yoro Atlántico Sur Tabasco Esmeraldas East New Britain Bas-Sassandra Lagunes Kelantan Selangor Morobe Oro Papua Negeri Sembilan Kaôh Kong Kepulauan Riau New Ireland Sulawesi Tenggara Estuaire Eastern Lampung Gôh-Djiboua Sulawesi Selatan Sulawesi Barat Casanare Irian Jaya Barat Bolívar Banten Cundinamarca Santander Los Rios Norte de Santander Vichada Santo Domingo de los Tsachilas Pulau Pinang Trang Comoé West New Britain Chumphon Escuintla Agusan del Sur Nariño
      
      What type of location data (boundary, point, etc.) is provided for smallholder farms?: NA
      
      Does the company disclose location of suppliers' production areas or primary processing sites?: Yes
      
      For what percent are boundaries disclosed?: 0%
      
      What is the volume of each forest risk commodity that the company sourced in the previous year from each national or subnational location?: NA
      
      For what percent is no location data disclosed?: 0%
      
      2021 Update - Publish Mills List which includes Universal Mill reference number, mill name, location coordinates, parent company, PO, PKO or SG delivered and country.
      
      Open source document
      Open source document
    - Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chain
      Yes, for its suppliers
      
      2/4
      
      Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chain
      
      Yes, for its suppliers
      
      2/4
      
      For what percentage of suppliers does the company use/rely on external mechanisms to monitor compliance?: 100%
      
      For what percentage of the commodity sourced by the company is deforestation/conversion monitored at the farm level on production units known to be in the company's supply chain?: NA
      
      For what percent of suppliers does the company directly monitor compliance of production or processing operations?: 100%
      
      How frequently is compliance assessed?: NA
      
      How is compliance monitored?: Internal monitoring and verification systems
      
      What percentage of the company's supply chain volume does that represent?: 100%
      
      "Bunge recognizes the risk of non-compliance by prospective suppliers, whether direct or indirect. Bunge will conduct appropriate due diligence to assess whether prospective suppliers have complied with our policy from February 2017, and if necessary to identify appropriate conservation / compensation / restoration measures to be carried out, prior to entering into any contracts. [...] Bunge may delegate responsibility for these steps to an implementation partner or trading partner (indirect supply) on a case-by-case basis. Bunge remains accountable for ensuring these tasks are completed and for ensuring pro-active monitoring using best-available data to verify our suppliers’ compliance with the policy. As part of our commitment to support industry transformation, Bunge will develop implementation and monitoring systems that are compatible with the work that others are doing in this sector."
      
      Open source document
    - Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
      No
      
      0/4
    - Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
      Engage with suppliers with a time-bound threat of exclusion
      
      2/2
      
      Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
      
      Engage with suppliers with a time-bound threat of exclusion
      
      2/2
      
      Does the company commit to engage with rightsholders, Indigenous peoples and local communities when developing the implementation plan?: No
      
      Does the company engage non-compliant indirect suppliers in order to address and remedy non-compliance?: Yes
      
      Does the company work with the non-compliant supplier to develop an implementation plan to remedy associated harms or non-compliance?: Yes
      
      What criteria does the policy specify for blacklisting or exclusion?: Non compliance
      
      What type of support does the company offer to its suppliers to help them achieve compliance with commitments?: Time-bound action plan
      
      "Where a mill or company in our supply chain is subject to findings or allegations of noncompliance, Bunge will engage with the supplier (for indirect supply, through the relevant trading partner) to agree a time-bound action plan and/or initiate our grievance procedure (see section 3.3)" details for each supply chain stage can be found in their policy (linked)
      
      Open source document
    - Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliers
      Yes, excluded
      
      1/2
      
      Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliers
      
      Yes, excluded
      
      1/2
      
      Does the company have a list of blacklisted or otherwise excluded suppliers or producers?: Yes
      
      How many noncompliant producers or suppliers are engaged through improvement plans or other processes, and what percentage of the company's supply chain volume does that represent?: 5
      
      In their grievance section, they present how many suppliers are blocked, suspended, under investigation, bring monitored and when the grievances are closed.
      
      Open source document
- Pulp & Paper *
  
  6/90
  - Commitment Strength
    
    0/17
    - Commodity-specific deforestation commitment
      
      0/9.5
      - Commitment details
        No commitment
        
        0/6
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        No
        
        0/2
      - Target date
        Post 2050 or no target date
        
        0/1
      - Interim target date
        No
        
        0/0.5
    - Commitment to a traceable supply chain
      
      0/7.5
      - Commitment details
        No traceability commitment
        
        0/4
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        No
        
        0/2
      - Target date
        Post 2050 or no target date
        
        0/1
      - Interim target date
        No
        
        0/0.5
  - Associated Human Rights Abuses
    
    3/17
    - Labour rights in the supply chain
      Yes
      
      3/3
      
      Labour rights in the supply chain
      
      Yes
      
      3/3
      
      Details of commitment: Discrimination; Forced labour; Child labour; Freedom of association
      
      How far back in the supply chain does this commitment apply?: NA
      
      "Beyond our own walls, we strive to root out all cases of human rights abuses in our value chains by upholding strict standards of compliance, from local and internationally-recognized conventions, to projects and activities that identify and eliminate cases of abuse. Our operations, employees, and third party contractors must comply with all applicable local laws, rules and regulations, as well as our company Code of Conduct. - Eliminating all forms of forced and child labor...Harassment, discrimination and abuse...Freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining...We require that our suppliers’ operations, and those of their subcontractors and suppliers, comply with Bunge’s global labor policy, as well as our Code of Conduct."
      
      Open source document
    - Inclusion of small-scale farmers
      No
      
      0/2
    - Gender equality in the supply chain
      No commitment
      
      0/2
    - Commitment to remediation
      No
      
      0/1
    - Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed Consent
      No
      
      0/3
    - Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territory
      No
      
      0/3
    - Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threats
      No
      
      0/3
  - Implementation and Reporting
    
    3/56
    - Reporting is independently verified
      No
      
      0/2
    - Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
      No
      
      0/3
    - Deforestation cut off date
      No
      
      0/2
    - Collaborative actions
      No
      
      0/2
    - Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land use
      No
      
      0/2
    - Risk assessments for forest risk
      No
      
      0/2
    - Operations assessed to comply with law
      No
      
      0/2
    - Accessible grievance mechanism
      No
      
      0/4
    - Report volumes of commodity sourced/used
      No reporting
      
      0/3
    - Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPIC
      Yes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains
      
      3/5
      
      Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPIC
      
      Yes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains
      
      2.5/5
      
      What percentage/number of new interests, developments, or expansions has the company used FPIC to secure consent of indigenous peoples/local communities?: NA
      
      What is the status of those FPIC processes?: NA
      
      What steps has the company taken to implement their labour rights commitment?: We began reviewing palm oil suppliers for labor risks and practices in 2017; however, we have been conducting reviews among grain suppliers in risky areas for a much longer time. In Brazil, we are a signatory of the National Slave Work Eradication Pact developed by the Ethos Institute and the International Labour Organization (ILO) and endorsed by the Brazilian government, civil society and other companies. We cross-reference our commercial systems to government forced-labor databases and block any contracts with listed entities.
      
      "In Brazil, we are a signatory of the National Slave Work Eradication Pact developed by the Ethos Institute and the International Labour Organization (ILO) and endorsed by the Brazilian government, civil society and other companies. We cross-reference our commercial systems to government forced-labor databases and block any contracts with listed entities. In 2018, a total of 10 suppliers were disqualified for being on the Ministry of Labor’s forced-labor blacklist, out of approximately 8,500 suppliers that had been screened over the year. "
      
      Open source document
    - Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rights
      No
      
      0/5
    - Downstream: Reporting suppliers
      No
      
      0/4
    - Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chain
      No
      
      0/4
    - Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
      No
      
      0/4
    - Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
      No engagement or exclusion
      
      0/2
    - Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliers
      No disclosure
      
      0/2

* commodity scores for which a company is not a powerbroker are given half the weighting of other commodities in total scores

Commitment strength

11/17

Avg. score
Implementation and Reporting

17/56

Avg. score
Associated Human Rights Abuses

6/17

Avg. score

Profile

Bunge is a global agribusiness operating in about 40 countries and involved in the processing, manufacture and trading of agricultural commodities. The company is one of the major players in the South American soy industry and one of the largest commodity traders globally. It is one of the largest soy processors in Brazil and one of the market leaders in Argentina, Bolivia and Paraguay. The company also has facilities in China and India. Bunge Ltd. is selected as a powerbroker for soy and paper packaging and is also assessed for its exposure to palm oil.

Sector

Industry sector

Agri commodities, Oils & fats, Paper Packaging

Segments

Trader, Processor, Manufacturer

United States

Company Type

Company type

Collective Commitments

Consumer Goods Forum member

New York Declaration on Forests signatory

Top Brands

Espiga, Homal, Nutra-Clear, WholeHarvest, Pour'n Fry, Pristine Gourmet, Nuestra, San Vincente, Manitoba, Silos de Oro, SPS, Veldrey, Primor, Startmix, SolMix, Venusz, Floriol, Komili, Bunge Pro, Kujawski, Deli, Kirlangic, Chambal, Masterline, Dalda, Gagan, Gagari, Primor, Soya, Salsaretti, Delicia

How we assess the Forest 500

To ensure deforestation free supply chains, companies need to adopt and implement timebound and measurable policies for forest risk commodities.

All assessments use policies published on company websites, some links may have changed or been removed since the time of assessment.

Full corporate sector performance data Forest 500 assessment methodology

More companies

Sysco

14%

Walgreens Boots Alliance

Hain Celestial Group, Inc.

14%

Disclaimer

This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our terms and conditions for use of data presented on this site.

All assessments use policies published on company and financial institution websites, and while we endeavor to keep them updated some links may have changed or been removed since the time of assessment.

Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.

bunge.jpg

Bunge Ltd

Total

Score:

Total score:

42%

Profile

Top Brands

How we assess the Forest 500

More companies

Disclaimer

bunge.jpg

Bunge Ltd

Total

Score:

Total score: 42%

Profile

Top Brands

How we assess the Forest 500

Related articles and press coverage

Beef companies failing to protect human rights

Why transparency is essential for eliminating deforestation in supply chains

Cash, Cattle and the Gran Chaco: How financiers turned a blind eye to Paraguay’s deforestation crisis

From foe to friend? The brands seeking to partner with indigenous peoples to end deforestation

More companies

Disclaimer

Total score:

42%