Carrefour S.A.

Assessment year: 2017

Total score 
4 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
5 out of 5
Commodity policies 
4 out of 5
Palm oil 
5 out of 5
Soy 
2 out of 5
Cattle 
4 out of 5
Pulp & paper 
5 out of 5
Operations 
4 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
4 out of 5

Assessment year: 2016

Total score 
4 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
5 out of 5
Commodity policies 
3 out of 5
Operations 
4 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
5 out of 5

Assessment year: 2015

Total score 
4 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
5 out of 5
Commodity policies 
3 out of 5
Operations 
3 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
5 out of 5

Assessment year: 2014

Total score 
3 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
2 out of 5
Commodity policies 
3 out of 5
Operations 
4 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
4 out of 5
Sector 
Food retail
Segments 
Retailer
HQ 
France
Total revenue (in million USD)
$83,101 (2015)
Company type 
Public listed

Collective commitments

New York Declaration on Forests signatory
No
Consumer Goods Forum member
Yes

250 Companies

To ensure deforestation free supply chains, companies need to adopt and implement timebound and measurable policies for forest risk commodities.

For analysis of how the corporate sector is performing click here.

This assessment has been carried out following the assessment methodology developed for the Forest 500 project.

Profile 

Carrefour is a large French retail group operating over 12,000 hypermarkets, supermarkets, and convenience stores in more than 30 countries in Europe, Latin America, and Asia. The breadth of its retail market means it is exposed to several forest risk commodities. Carrefour is one of the largest retailers globally, ranking among the top five by edible grocery sales. It is also among the five largest retailers in Europe and in Latin America.

Other companies

Marks & Spencer Group PLC

Score
5 out of 5

Carrefour S.A.

Score
4 out of 5

Tesco

Score
4 out of 5

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

Score
4 out of 5

J Sainsbury PLC

Score
3 out of 5

Target Corp.

Score
3 out of 5

Disclaimer

This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our citation guidance for advice on how to cite data presented here or elsewhere on this site.

Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.