Cencoprod Ltda

Overall approach

0/10
- Overarching commitment on deforestation
  
  0/4
- Signatory to an initiative tackling deforestation
  
  0/1
- Awareness of the value of forests
  
  0/1
- Deforestation as a business risk
  
  0/1
- High-level management of deforestion
  
  0/1
- Executive compensation linked to deforestation
- Target to reduce emissions from land-use change
  
  0/1
- Reporting on emissions from land-use change
  
  0/1
- Disclosure of conservation activity
- Disclosure of reforestation activity
- Target to reduce emissions in scope 1/2
Commodity score

3/90
- Leather
  
  5/90
  - Commitment Strength
    
    3/17
    - Commodity-specific deforestation commitment
      
      3/9.5
      - Commitment details
        Sustainability commitment/other
        
        1/6
        
        Commodity-specific deforestation commitment
        
        Sustainability commitment/other
        
        1/6
        
        When was this commitment set?: NA
        
        Which certification schemes are used?: Other certification
        
        Do they have a deforestation commitment covering animal feed?: No
        
        If other certification, specify: Leather Working Group
        
        "We are proud to have received the highest rating in our first audit LEATHER WORKING GROUP Completed in the month of August 2019 that certifies our environmental commitment and endorses the entire production process of the LEATHER WET BLUE Positioning the Leather from the Paraguayan Chaco in the highest category worldwide."
        
        Open source document
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        No
        
        0/2
        
        Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        
        No
        
        0/2
        
        If no, what is excluded?: Location
        
        What subsidiaries are explicitly included?: Paraguayan Chaco
        
        "We are proud to have received the highest rating in our first audit LEATHER WORKING GROUP Completed in the month of August 2019 that certifies our environmental commitment and endorses the entire production process of the LEATHER WET BLUE Positioning the Leather from the Paraguayan Chaco in the highest category worldwide."
        
        Open source document
      - Target date
        Current/achieved
        
        1/1
        
        Target date
        
        Current/achieved
        
        1/1
        
        What actions or steps are identified for time-bound implementation?: NA
        
        "We are proud to have received the highest rating in our first audit LEATHER WORKING GROUP Completed in the month of August 2019 that certifies our environmental commitment and endorses the entire production process of the LEATHER WET BLUE Positioning the Leather from the Paraguayan Chaco in the highest category worldwide."
        
        Open source document
      - Interim target date
        NA (target date current or achieved or 2023)
        
        0.5/0.5
        
        Interim target date
        
        NA (target date current or achieved or 2023)
        
        0.5/0.5
        
        What date is given for the interim milestone?: NA
        
        "We are proud to have received the highest rating in our first audit LEATHER WORKING GROUP Completed in the month of August 2019 that certifies our environmental commitment and endorses the entire production process of the LEATHER WET BLUE Positioning the Leather from the Paraguayan Chaco in the highest category worldwide."
        
        Open source document
    - Commitment to a traceable supply chain
      
      0/7.5
      - Commitment details
        No traceability commitment
        
        0/4
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        No
        
        0/2
      - Target date
        Post 2050 or no target date
        
        0/1
      - Interim target date
        No
        
        0/0.5
  - Associated Human Rights Abuses
    
    0/17
    - Labour rights in the supply chain
      No
      
      0/3
    - Inclusion of small-scale farmers
      No
      
      0/2
    - Gender equality in the supply chain
      No commitment
      
      0/2
    - Commitment to remediation
      No
      
      0/1
    - Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed Consent
      No
      
      0/3
    - Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territory
      No
      
      0/3
    - Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threats
      No
      
      0/3
  - Implementation and Reporting
    
    3/56
    - Reporting proportion of compliant volumes
      
      0/0
    - Reporting is independently verified
      Yes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme
      
      0/2
      
      Reporting is independently verified
      
      Yes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme
      
      0/2
      
      Which processes or groups does the company use for third party verification?: Leather Working Group
      
      What percent of the company's supply volume is verified using company verification systems?: 100%
      
      For what percent of the company's supply volume is third-party verification of performance relative to commitments conducted?: NA
      
      Which tools, approaches, third-party verification, including certification, schemes are used?: Leather Working Group
      
      Is the performance of compliance of some suppliers, sources, or origins not verified, and if so why not?: No
      
      What methods are used for verification?: NA
    - Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
      No
      
      0/3
    - Deforestation cut off date
      No
      
      0/2
    - Collaborative actions
      No
      
      0/2
    - Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land use
      No
      
      0/2
    - Risk assessments for forest risk
      No
      
      0/2
    - Operations assessed to comply with law
      No
      
      0/2
    - Accessible grievance mechanism
      No
      
      0/4
    - Report volumes of commodity sourced/used
      No reporting
      
      0/3
    - Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPIC
      No
      
      0/5
    - Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rights
      No
      
      0/5
    - Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisition
      No
      
      0/4
    - Upstream: Reporting production/processing locations
      No disclosure
      
      0/4
    - Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processing
      No
      
      0/4
    - Upstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
      No
      
      0/4
- Beef *
  
  0/90
  - Commitment Strength
    
    0/17
    - Commodity-specific deforestation commitment
      
      0/9.5
      - Commitment details
        No commitment
        
        0/6
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        No
        
        0/2
      - Target date
        Post 2050 or no target date
        
        0/1
      - Interim target date
        No
        
        0/0.5
    - Commitment to a traceable supply chain
      
      0/7.5
      - Commitment details
        No traceability commitment
        
        0/4
      - Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
        No
        
        0/2
      - Target date
        Post 2050 or no target date
        
        0/1
      - Interim target date
        No
        
        0/0.5
  - Associated Human Rights Abuses
    
    0/17
    - Labour rights in the supply chain
      No
      
      0/3
    - Inclusion of small-scale farmers
      No
      
      0/2
    - Gender equality in the supply chain
      No commitment
      
      0/2
    - Commitment to remediation
      No
      
      0/1
    - Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed Consent
      No
      
      0/3
    - Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territory
      No
      
      0/3
    - Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threats
      No
      
      0/3
  - Implementation and Reporting
    
    0/56
    - Reporting is independently verified
      No
      
      0/2
    - Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
      No
      
      0/3
    - Deforestation cut off date
      No
      
      0/2
    - Collaborative actions
      No
      
      0/2
    - Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land use
      No
      
      0/2
    - Risk assessments for forest risk
      No
      
      0/2
    - Operations assessed to comply with law
      No
      
      0/2
    - Accessible grievance mechanism
      No
      
      0/4
    - Report volumes of commodity sourced/used
      No reporting
      
      0/3
    - Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPIC
      No
      
      0/5
    - Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rights
      No
      
      0/5
    - Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisition
      No
      
      0/4
    - Upstream: Reporting production/processing locations
      No disclosure
      
      0/4
    - Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processing
      No
      
      0/4
    - Upstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
      No
      
      0/4

* commodity scores for which a company is not a powerbroker are given half the weighting of other commodities in total scores

Commitment strength

2/17

Avg. score
Implementation and Reporting

2/56

Avg. score
Associated Human Rights Abuses

0/17

Avg. score

Profile

Cencoprod Ltda. is an alliance between cooperatives in Paraguay’s Chaco processing leather products. Cencoprod Ltda is selected as a powerbroker for leather.

Sector

Industry sector

Leather processor

Segments

Processor

Paraguay

Company Type

Company type

Collective Commitments

Consumer Goods Forum member

New York Declaration on Forests signatory

How we assess the Forest 500

To ensure deforestation free supply chains, companies need to adopt and implement timebound and measurable policies for forest risk commodities.

All assessments use policies published on company websites, some links may have changed or been removed since the time of assessment.

Full corporate sector performance data Forest 500 assessment methodology

More companies

Sadesa

Vancouros Indústria e Comércio de Couros LTDA

F.R.I.A.R. S.A.

Frigorifico Concepcion S.A.

Disclaimer

This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our terms and conditions for use of data presented on this site.

All assessments use policies published on company and financial institution websites, and while we endeavor to keep them updated some links may have changed or been removed since the time of assessment.

Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.

cencoprod_ltda._logo.png

Cencoprod Ltda

Total

Score:

Total score:

3%

Profile

How we assess the Forest 500

More companies

Disclaimer

cencoprod_ltda._logo.png

Cencoprod Ltda

Total

Score:

Total score: 3%

Profile

How we assess the Forest 500

Related articles and press coverage

Beef companies failing to protect human rights

Why transparency is essential for eliminating deforestation in supply chains

40% of the Forest 500 have yet to set a single policy on deforestation

More companies

Disclaimer

Total score:

3%