-
Overall approach7/10
-
Overarching commitment on deforestation3/4
-
Signatory to an initiative tackling deforestation1/1
-
Awareness of the value of forests1/1
-
Deforestation as a business risk1/1
-
High-level management of deforestion1/1
-
Executive compensation linked to deforestation
-
Target to reduce emissions from land-use change0/1
-
Reporting on emissions from land-use change0/1
-
Disclosure of conservation activity
-
Disclosure of reforestation activity
-
Target to reduce emissions in scope 1/2
-
-
Commodity score43/90
-
Palm oil51/90
-
Commitment Strength15/17
-
Commodity-specific deforestation commitment7/9.5
-
Commitment detailsZero-gross deforestation4/6
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationYes2/2
-
Target date20250.8/1
-
Interim target dateYes0.5/0.5
-
-
Commitment to a traceable supply chain7/7.5
-
Commitment detailsTraces to Point of production4/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationYes2/2
-
Target date20250.8/1
-
Interim target dateNA (target date current or achieved or 2023)0.5/0.5
-
-
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses11/17
-
Labour rights in the supply chainYes3/3
-
Inclusion of small-scale farmersYes2/2
-
Gender equality in the supply chainNo commitment0/2
-
Commitment to remediationYes1/1
-
Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed ConsentYes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions2/3
-
Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territoryNo0/3
-
Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threatsYes3/3
-
-
Implementation and Reporting26/56
-
Reporting proportion of compliant volumes0/0
-
Reporting is independently verifiedYes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme0/2
-
Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chainYes, required3/3
-
Deforestation cut off dateYes, for all sourcing regions/operations2/2
-
Collaborative actionsYes2/2
-
Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land useNo0/2
-
Risk assessments for forest riskYes2/2
-
Operations assessed to comply with lawYes2/2
-
Accessible grievance mechanismNo0/4
-
Report volumes of commodity sourced/usedReporting total volume3/3
-
Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPICYes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains3/5
-
Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rightsNo0/5
-
Downstream: Reporting suppliersYes, report direct suppliers2/4
-
Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chainYes, for its suppliers2/4
-
Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliersEngage with suppliers but with no time-bound threat of exclusion1/2
-
Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliersYes, engaged1/2
-
-
-
Pulp & Paper51/90
-
Commitment Strength14/17
-
Commodity-specific deforestation commitment7/9.5
-
Commitment detailsZero-gross deforestation4/6
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationYes2/2
-
Target date20250.8/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
Commitment to a traceable supply chain8/7.5
-
Commitment detailsTraces to Point of production4/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationYes2/2
-
Target dateCurrent/achieved1/1
-
Interim target dateNA (target date current or achieved or 2023)0.5/0.5
-
-
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses9/17
-
Labour rights in the supply chainYes3/3
-
Inclusion of small-scale farmersNo0/2
-
Gender equality in the supply chainNo commitment0/2
-
Commitment to remediationYes1/1
-
Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed ConsentYes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions2/3
-
Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territoryNo0/3
-
Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threatsYes3/3
-
-
Implementation and Reporting29/56
-
Reporting proportion of compliant volumes0/0
-
Reporting is independently verifiedYes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme0/2
-
Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chainYes, required3/3
-
Deforestation cut off dateYes, for all sourcing regions/operations2/2
-
Collaborative actionsYes2/2
-
Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land useNo0/2
-
Risk assessments for forest riskYes2/2
-
Operations assessed to comply with lawYes2/2
-
Accessible grievance mechanismNo0/4
-
Report volumes of commodity sourced/usedReporting total volume3/3
-
Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPICYes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains3/5
-
Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rightsNo0/5
-
Downstream: Reporting suppliersNo0/4
-
Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chainYes, for its suppliers2/4
-
Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliersEngage with suppliers but with no time-bound threat of exclusion1/2
-
Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliersYes, engaged; Yes, excluded2/2
-
-
-
Soy *10/90
-
Commitment Strength0/17
-
Commodity-specific deforestation commitment0/9.5
-
Commitment detailsNo commitment0/6
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationNo0/2
-
Target datePost 2050 or no target date0/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
Commitment to a traceable supply chain0/7.5
-
Commitment detailsNo traceability commitment0/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationNo0/2
-
Target datePost 2050 or no target date0/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses5/17
-
Labour rights in the supply chainYes3/3
-
Inclusion of small-scale farmersNo0/2
-
Gender equality in the supply chainNo commitment0/2
-
Commitment to remediationNo0/1
-
Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed ConsentYes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions2/3
-
Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territoryNo0/3
-
Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threatsNo0/3
-
-
Implementation and Reporting5/56
-
Reporting is independently verifiedNo0/2
-
Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chainNo0/3
-
Deforestation cut off dateNo0/2
-
Collaborative actionsNo0/2
-
Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land useNo0/2
-
Risk assessments for forest riskNo0/2
-
Operations assessed to comply with lawYes2/2
-
Accessible grievance mechanismNo0/4
-
Report volumes of commodity sourced/usedNo reporting0/3
-
Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPICYes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains3/5
-
Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rightsNo0/5
-
Downstream: Reporting suppliersNo0/4
-
Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chainNo0/4
-
Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliersNo engagement or exclusion0/2
-
Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliersNo disclosure0/2
-
-
-
-
Commitment strength12/17
-
Implementation and Reporting23/56
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses9/17
* commodity scores for which a company is not a powerbroker are given half the weighting of other commodities in total scores
Profile
Kao Corporation is a Japanese consumer goods company that manufactures beauty, health and home care products, whilst also providing chemicals to industrial markets. The company owns well-known brands such as Molton Brown, John Freida and Merries. Kao Corp is exposed to palm oil and soy, which are used in its consumer products, and also to pulp and paper which feature in both the company’s products and its packaging. Kao Corp. is selected as a powerbroker for palm oil and paper packaging and is also assessed for its exposure to soy.
Top Brands
Disclaimer
This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our terms and conditions for use of data presented on this site.
All assessments use policies published on company and financial institution websites, and while we endeavor to keep them updated some links may have changed or been removed since the time of assessment.
Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.