Nike Inc.

Assessment year: 2017

Total score 
3 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
0 out of 5
Commodity policies 
3 out of 5
Cattle 
2 out of 5
Pulp & paper 
4 out of 5
Operations 
4 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
3 out of 5

Assessment year: 2016

Total score 
3 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
0 out of 5
Commodity policies 
2 out of 5
Operations 
4 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
4 out of 5

Assessment year: 2015

Total score 
4 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
2 out of 5
Commodity policies 
4 out of 5
Operations 
4 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
4 out of 5

Assessment year: 2014

Total score 
3 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
2 out of 5
Commodity policies 
3 out of 5
Operations 
4 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
4 out of 5
Sector 
Apparel & footwear
Segments 
Manufacturer, Retailer
HQ 
United States
Total revenue (in million USD)
$32,376 (2016)
Company type 
Public listed

Collective commitments

New York Declaration on Forests signatory
No
Consumer Goods Forum member
Yes

250 Companies

To ensure deforestation free supply chains, companies need to adopt and implement timebound and measurable policies for forest risk commodities.

For analysis of how the corporate sector is performing click here.

This assessment has been carried out following the assessment methodology developed for the Forest 500 project.

Profile 

Nike is a manufacturer of sports shoes, sports apparel and accessories. The Company’s famous brands include Nike, Converse, Hurley, and Jordan. Nike was the leading sportswear brand in the world in 2015. Many of Nike’s shoes are made using leather.

Other companies

Marks & Spencer Group PLC

Score
5 out of 5

Kering S.A.

Score
4 out of 5

Adidas Group

Score
4 out of 5

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB

Score
3 out of 5

New Balance Athletic Shoe Inc.

Score
3 out of 5

Coach Inc.

Score
3 out of 5

Disclaimer

This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our citation guidance for advice on how to cite data presented here or elsewhere on this site.

Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.