-
Overall approach8/10
-
Overarching commitment on deforestation3/4
-
Signatory to an initiative tackling deforestation1/1
-
Awareness of the value of forests1/1
-
Deforestation as a business risk1/1
-
High-level management of deforestion1/1
-
Executive compensation linked to deforestation
-
Target to reduce emissions from land-use change1/1
-
Reporting on emissions from land-use change0/1
-
Disclosure of conservation activity
-
Disclosure of reforestation activity
-
Target to reduce emissions in scope 1/2
-
-
Commodity score29/90
-
Soy16/90
-
Commitment Strength0/17
-
Commodity-specific deforestation commitment0/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationNo0/2
-
Target datePost 2050 or no target date0/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
Commitment to a traceable supply chain0/7.5
-
Commitment detailsNo traceability commitment0/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationNo0/2
-
Target datePost 2050 or no target date0/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses9/17
-
Labour rights in the supply chainYes3/3
-
Inclusion of small-scale farmersYes2/2
-
Gender equality in the supply chainCommitment to address the inclusion of women and ensure equality in commodity supply chains2/2
-
Commitment to remediationNo0/1
-
Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed ConsentYes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions2/3
-
Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territoryNo0/3
-
Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threatsNo0/3
-
-
Implementation and Reporting7/56
-
Reporting is independently verifiedNo0/2
-
Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chainNo0/3
-
Deforestation cut off dateNo0/2
-
Collaborative actionsNo0/2
-
Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land useNo0/2
-
Risk assessments for forest riskNo0/2
-
Operations assessed to comply with lawYes2/2
-
Accessible grievance mechanismYes, publicly accessible grievance mechanism2/4
-
Report volumes of commodity sourced/usedNo reporting0/3
-
Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPICYes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains3/5
-
Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rightsNo0/5
-
Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisitionNo0/4
-
Upstream: Reporting production/processing locationsNo disclosure0/4
-
Downstream: Reporting suppliersNo0/4
-
Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processingNo0/4
-
Upstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chainNo0/4
-
Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliersNo engagement or exclusion0/2
-
Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliersNo disclosure0/2
-
-
-
Timber35/90
-
Commitment Strength4/17
-
Commodity-specific deforestation commitment0/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationNo0/2
-
Target datePost 2050 or no target date0/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
Commitment to a traceable supply chain0/7.5
-
Commitment detailsNo traceability commitment0/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationNo0/2
-
Target datePost 2050 or no target date0/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses11/17
-
Labour rights in the supply chainYes3/3
-
Inclusion of small-scale farmersNo0/2
-
Gender equality in the supply chainCommitment to address the inclusion of women and ensure equality in commodity supply chains2/2
-
Commitment to remediationYes1/1
-
Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed ConsentYes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions2/3
-
Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territoryYes3/3
-
Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threatsNo0/3
-
-
Implementation and Reporting21/56
-
Reporting proportion of compliant volumes0/0
-
Reporting is independently verifiedYes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme0/2
-
Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chainYes, encouraged0/3
-
Deforestation cut off dateNo0/2
-
Collaborative actionsNo0/2
-
Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land useNo0/2
-
Risk assessments for forest riskYes2/2
-
Operations assessed to comply with lawYes2/2
-
Accessible grievance mechanismYes, publicly accessible grievance mechanism2/4
-
Report volumes of commodity sourced/usedNo reporting0/3
-
Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPICYes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains3/5
-
Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rightsYes, company publishes details of the process for addressing conflicts related to customary rights to land, resources, and territory in its own operations and/or supply chain3/5
-
Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisitionYes4/4
-
Upstream: Reporting production/processing locationsReports location of un-certified land holdings; Reports location of company-owned processing facilities2/4
-
Downstream: Reporting suppliersNo0/4
-
Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processingYes, using an internal verification system4/4
-
Upstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chainYes, for its suppliers2/4
-
Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliersEngage with suppliers with a time-bound threat of exclusion2/2
-
Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliersNo disclosure0/2
-
-
-
Palm oil *60/90
-
Commitment Strength15/17
-
Commodity-specific deforestation commitment4/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationYes2/2
-
Target dateCurrent/achieved1/1
-
Interim target dateNA (target date current or achieved or 2023)0.5/0.5
-
-
Commitment to a traceable supply chain8/7.5
-
Commitment detailsTraces to Point of production4/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationYes2/2
-
Target date20221/1
-
Interim target dateNA (target date current or achieved or 2023)0.5/0.5
-
-
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses10/17
-
Labour rights in the supply chainYes3/3
-
Inclusion of small-scale farmersYes2/2
-
Gender equality in the supply chainCommitment to address the inclusion of women and ensure equality in commodity supply chains2/2
-
Commitment to remediationYes1/1
-
Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed ConsentYes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions2/3
-
Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territoryNo0/3
-
Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threatsNo0/3
-
-
Implementation and Reporting36/56
-
Reporting proportion of compliant volumes0/0
-
Reporting is independently verifiedNo0/2
-
Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chainYes, encouraged0/3
-
Deforestation cut off dateYes, for all sourcing regions/operations2/2
-
Collaborative actionsYes2/2
-
Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land useYes2/2
-
Risk assessments for forest riskYes2/2
-
Operations assessed to comply with lawYes2/2
-
Accessible grievance mechanismYes, and published details of any grievances within the last two years (2019-2021)4/4
-
Report volumes of commodity sourced/usedReporting total volume3/3
-
Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPICYes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains3/5
-
Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rightsNo0/5
-
Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisitionYes4/4
-
Upstream: Reporting production/processing locationsReports location of certified land holdings; Reports location of company-owned processing facilities2/4
-
Downstream: Reporting suppliersYes, report direct suppliers2/4
-
Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processingYes, using an internal verification system4/4
-
Upstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chainYes, for its suppliers; Also for its suppliers production or primary processing operations in its supply chains3/4
-
Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliersSuspend suppliers, engage to bring into compliance, and reintroduce to the supply chain2/2
-
Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliersYes, engaged; Yes, excluded2/2
-
-
-
Pulp & Paper *14/90
-
Commitment Strength0/17
-
Commodity-specific deforestation commitment0/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationNo0/2
-
Target datePost 2050 or no target date0/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
Commitment to a traceable supply chain0/7.5
-
Commitment detailsNo traceability commitment0/4
-
Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operationNo0/2
-
Target datePost 2050 or no target date0/1
-
Interim target dateNo0/0.5
-
-
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses8/17
-
Labour rights in the supply chainYes3/3
-
Inclusion of small-scale farmersNo0/2
-
Gender equality in the supply chainCommitment to address the inclusion of women and ensure equality in commodity supply chains2/2
-
Commitment to remediationYes1/1
-
Commitment to test Free, Prior and Informed ConsentYes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions2/3
-
Commitment to respect customary rights to land, resources, and territoryNo0/3
-
Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threatsNo0/3
-
-
Implementation and Reporting7/56
-
Reporting is independently verifiedNo0/2
-
Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chainNo0/3
-
Deforestation cut off dateNo0/2
-
Collaborative actionsNo0/2
-
Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land useNo0/2
-
Risk assessments for forest riskNo0/2
-
Operations assessed to comply with lawYes2/2
-
Accessible grievance mechanismYes, publicly accessible grievance mechanism2/4
-
Report volumes of commodity sourced/usedNo reporting0/3
-
Monitor compliance for labour rights and FPICYes, and publishes evidence of actions taken to implement its commitment on labour rights in the production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages or otherwise controls or its supply chains3/5
-
Monitor compliance for zero tolerance approach and customary rightsNo0/5
-
Downstream: Reporting suppliersNo0/4
-
Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chainNo0/4
-
Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestationNo0/4
-
Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliersNo engagement or exclusion0/2
-
Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliersNo disclosure0/2
-
-
-
-
Commitment strength4/17
-
Implementation and Reporting16/56
-
Associated Human Rights Abuses9/17
* commodity scores for which a company is not a powerbroker are given half the weighting of other commodities in total scores
Profile
Olam international is a leading agricultural commodity business operating throughout the supply chain across 70 countries. It is a global market leader in many agricultural commodities such as cocoa and coffee, but also is a major player in African oil palm and forestry. Olam’s subsidiary, Congolaise Industrielle de Bois (CIB) operates forestry concessions in the Republic of Congo. The company is also active in soy cultivation and processing in South America and Africa. Olam International is selected as a powerbroker for soy and timber and is also assessed for its exposure to palm oil, soy and paper packaging.
Disclaimer
This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our terms and conditions for use of data presented on this site.
All assessments use policies published on company and financial institution websites, and while we endeavor to keep them updated some links may have changed or been removed since the time of assessment.
Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.