PT Rajawali Corp.

Assessment year: 2017

Total score 
3 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
2 out of 5
Commodity policies 
4 out of 5
Palm oil 
4 out of 5
Operations 
3 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
2 out of 5

Assessment year: 2016

Total score 
2 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
0 out of 5
Commodity policies 
3 out of 5
Operations 
0 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
3 out of 5

Assessment year: 2015

Total score 
1 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
0 out of 5
Commodity policies 
2 out of 5
Operations 
0 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
2 out of 5

Assessment year: 2014

Total score 
0 out of 5
Overall forest policy 
0 out of 5
Commodity policies 
0 out of 5
Operations 
0 out of 5
Reporting and transparency 
0 out of 5
Sector 
Agri commodities, Agriculture
Segments 
Producer, Processor
HQ 
Indonesia
Company type 
Private

Collective commitments

New York Declaration on Forests signatory
No
Consumer Goods Forum member
No

250 Companies

To ensure deforestation free supply chains, companies need to adopt and implement timebound and measurable policies for forest risk commodities.

For analysis of how the corporate sector is performing click here.

This assessment has been carried out following the assessment methodology developed for the Forest 500 project.

Profile 

PT Rajawali Corp. is an Indonesian investment holding company with diverse business interests including hospitality, media, logistics, mining, and agriculture. It has one of the five largest landbanks globally among palm oil producers. In 2015, one of the corporation’s subsidiaries, Eagle High Plantations, had a palm oil landbank of more than 425,000 hectares. Eagle High Plantations also has an annual processing capacity of 2.3 million metric tons of fresh fruit bunches.

Other companies

First Resources Ltd.

Score
5 out of 5

Sime Darby Bhd.

Score
5 out of 5

Société Financière des Caoutchoucs (SOCFIN)

Score
5 out of 5

Grupo Andre Maggi

Score
5 out of 5

Astra Agro Lestari

Score
5 out of 5

Bumitama Agri

Score
4 out of 5

Disclaimer

This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our citation guidance for advice on how to cite data presented here or elsewhere on this site.

Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.