Download data

Powerbroker for

Select an assessment year:

  • Overall approach
    3/10
    • Overarching commitment on deforestation
      0/4
      Overall commitment
      Commodity-specific commitment - commitment that does not apply to all of the commodities the company is exposed to
      0/4
      Do they have a commitment for other non-Forest 500 commodities, if so which?: NA

      Which commodities does the commodity-specific commitment apply to?: Palm oil
      "We have pledged to ensure responsible and sustainable agricultural development while committing to zero deforestation, the protection of Human Rights, Social Development and Corporate Integrity in our oil palm operations." [...] "Sime Darby Plantation and Sime Darby Oils are jointly committed to No Deforestation, No Peat and No Exploitation (NDPE) and today our own operations deliver to standards that go beyond those commitments. Our expectations of third-party suppliers are clear: we require them to meet NDPE standards as well." [...] " We have pledged to ensure responsible and sustainable agricultural development while committing to zero deforestation, the protection of Human Rights, Social Development and Corporate Integrity in our oil palm operations."
    • Signatory to an initiative tackling deforestation
      1/1
      Signatory
      Yes
      1/1
      "Sime Darby also became one of the signatories of the New York Declaration on Forests on 23 September 2014 at the United Nations Climate Summit 2014."
    • Awareness of the value of forests
      1/1
      Awareness
      Yes
      1/1
      "We recognise the inherent value of forests and the biodiversity they contain, as well as the scarcity of natural resources and threats from climate change. [...] Protect and conserve biodiversity and ecosystems In order to conserve biodiversity and protect ecosystems, we commit to: ..."
    • Deforestation as a business risk
      0/1
    • High-level management of deforestion
      1/1
      High-level management
      Yes
      1/1
      Which commodities does it apply to?: Palm oil

      How often does the committee or board meet to assess company's progress on addressing deforestation-related issues?: NA
      "The Sustainability Committee was established on 28 August 2012 and has oversight responsibilities in relation to the Sime Darby Group’s objectives, policies and practices pertaining to sustainability, more particularly around contributing to a better society, minimising environmental harm and delivering sustainable development."
    • Executive compensation linked to deforestation
    • Target to reduce emissions from land-use change
      0/1
      Land-use change emissions
      No
      0/1
      What is the target date for the company to achieve their climate target?: NA
    • Reporting on emissions from land-use change
      0/1
    • Disclosure of conservation activity
      Conservation disclosure
      No
      0/0
      How many hectares of conservation area are being supported or facilitated by the company on land it does not own or manage?: NA
    • Disclosure of reforestation activity
      Reforestation disclosure
      Yes
      0/0
      How many hectares of reforestation or restoration are being or have been conducted or facilitated by the company?: 5495 ha
      "On 7 December 2018, we officially handed over the reforestation and rehabilitation of Orangutan Habitats in the Bukit Piton Forest Reserve to the Sabah Forestry Department. After 10 years of working on the project with a commitment of RM25 million, we celebrated several major achievements. A total of 300,000 seedlings of more than 95 species of trees were planted across 5,400ha of land. The population of orangutans, which was dwindling, has stabilised and they are now well-distributed in the area. Our efforts also resulted in the reclassification of the area from Class II Commercial Forest to Class I Protected Forest or Totally Protected Area in 2012. [...] In total, both projects contribute close to 500,000 trees to more than 1.5 million trees already planted under four major projects supported by YSD; the two others being the Kinabatangan RiLeaf Project with Nestlé Malaysia; and the peat swamp protection and rehabilitation project in the Raja Musa Forest Reserve with Global Environment Centre (GEC). We plan to continue our reforestation efforts with the Creation of Stepping Stones project in Sime Darby Plantation’s Kamunting Estate in Sungai Siput, Perak. The project, to be implemented over two years until 2021 with a commitment of RM2 million, will see the planting of 70,000 trees on 95ha of land in suitable areas within the estate. The project aims to connect the forest patches within the estate, which is situated nearby the Kledang Saiong Permanent Forest Reserve, to act as a corridor for wildlife" -
    • Target to reduce emissions in scope 1/2
      Reduce emissions
      Yes
      0/0
      Type of climate target: Other or unclear

      What is the target date for the company to achieve their climate target?: 2030

      Is this target aligned with/verified by SBTi?: No
      "30% reduction of emissions by 2030 (scope 1 and 2 only) from 2020 levels"
  • Commodity score
    40/90
    • Palm oil
      56/90
      • Commitment Strength
        14/17
        • Commitment to protect priority forests
          8/9.5
          • Commitment details
            Zero-gross conversion
            6/6
            Commitment to protect priority forests
            Zero-gross conversion
            6/6
            Which certification schemes are used?: RSPO

            Does the company have a commitment to the protection of other specific named ecosystems?: HCS; Peat

            When was this commitment set?: 2020
            "Commitment towards no deforestation and new development on peat. Recognising the climatic impact that may arise from destruction of forest and development on peat, we have committed to: 3.2.1 Eliminating deforestation⁴ and conversion⁵ of other natural ecosystems⁶ in our operations and supply chain. 3.2.2 No new development of ‘potential high carbon stock area’ forest as defined by the ‘HCS Approach’. 3.2.3 No new development of peat areas, regardless of depth or location. Existing planted areas shall be managed according to best practices and rehabilitated if the area reaches natural gravity drainability limit⁷ measured using recognised method. 3.2.4 Extending our commitments to those in our supply chain through our policy on ‘Working with Suppliers to Draw the Line on Deforestation’." [...] "SD Plantation is the world’s largest producer of palm oil, and accounts for more than 20 percent of the global certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO) production. Ninety seven percent of the three million metric tonnes (MT) of palm oil it produces annually is certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)."
          • Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
            Yes
            2/2
            Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
            Yes
            2/2
            What subsidiaries are explicitly included?: NA

            What is the rationale for any exclusions?: NA

            What percentage of commodity production/sourcing is excluded?: NA

            What subsidiaries are explicitly excluded?: NA
            "Commitment towards no deforestation and new development on peat. Recognising the climatic impact that may arise from destruction of forest and development on peat, we have committed to: 3.2.1 Eliminating deforestation⁴ and conversion⁵ of other natural ecosystems⁶ in our operations and supply chain. 3.2.2 No new development of ‘potential high carbon stock area’ forest as defined by the ‘HCS Approach’. 3.2.3 No new development of peat areas, regardless of depth or location. Existing planted areas shall be managed according to best practices and rehabilitated if the area reaches natural gravity drainability limit⁷ measured using recognised method. 3.2.4 Extending our commitments to those in our supply chain through our policy on ‘Working with Suppliers to Draw the Line on Deforestation’." [...] "SD Plantation is the world’s largest producer of palm oil, and accounts for more than 20 percent of the global certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO) production. Ninety seven percent of the three million metric tonnes (MT) of palm oil it produces annually is certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)."
          • Target date
            Post 2050 or no target date
            0/1
            Target date
            Post 2050 or no target date
            0/1
            What actions or steps are identified for time-bound implementation?: NA
          • Interim target date
            No
            0/0.5
        • Commitment to a traceable supply chain
          6/7.5
          • Commitment details
            Traces to Point of production
            4/4
            Commitment to a traceable supply chain
            Traces to Point of production
            4/4
            When was this commitment set?: 2019
            In their Responsible Agriculture Charter SDP commit to "3.5.1 Working towards a fully traceable supply chain, with visibility to the mill and plantation. 3.5.2 Ensuring that the production of all our raw materials, including from third party suppliers, are aligned to the No Deforestation, No Peat and No Exploitation commitments in this Charter. 3.5.3 Promoting the adoption of the RSPO standard and use of RSPO certified products, as outlined in the Shared Responsibility requirements." [...] "In 2019, we set out to drive traceability through our supply chain and in the industry through the launch of Crosscheck; an open access online tool that enables anyone to alert us to problems on the ground in the supply chain. We also updated our supplier policy in 2019 to engage more fully in cases of a breach in No Deforestation No Peat and No Exploitation (NDPE) standards in our supply chain" [...] "Percentage of oils traceable to mills: CPO: 85.4% Traceable; PKO: 100% Traceable"
          • Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
            Yes
            2/2
            Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
            Yes
            2/2
            What subsidiaries are explicitly excluded?: NA

            What subsidiaries are explicitly included?: NA

            What is the rationale for any exclusions?: NA

            What percentage of commodity production/sourcing is excluded?: NA
            In their Responsible Agriculture Charter SDP commit to "3.5.1 Working towards a fully traceable supply chain, with visibility to the mill and plantation. 3.5.2 Ensuring that the production of all our raw materials, including from third party suppliers, are aligned to the No Deforestation, No Peat and No Exploitation commitments in this Charter. 3.5.3 Promoting the adoption of the RSPO standard and use of RSPO certified products, as outlined in the Shared Responsibility requirements." [...] "In 2019, we set out to drive traceability through our supply chain and in the industry through the launch of Crosscheck; an open access online tool that enables anyone to alert us to problems on the ground in the supply chain. We also updated our supplier policy in 2019 to engage more fully in cases of a breach in No Deforestation No Peat and No Exploitation (NDPE) standards in our supply chain"
          • Target date
            Post 2050 or no target date
            0/1
            Target date
            Post 2050 or no target date
            0/1
            What actions or steps are identified for time-bound implementation?: NA
          • Interim target date
            No
            0/0.5
            Interim target date
            No
            0/0.5
            What date is given for the interim milestone?: NA
      • Associated Human Rights Abuses
        12/17
        • Labour rights in the supply chain
          Yes
          3/3
          Labour rights in the supply chain
          Yes
          3/3
          Details of commitment: ILO; UNGP; UN Declaration for HR; Discrimination; Forced labour; Child labour; Freedom of association

          How far back in the supply chain does this commitment apply?: NA
          "At Sime Darby Plantation, we believe that businesses have a responsibility to respect, support and uphold fundamental human rights as expressed, amongst others, in the Universal Declaration for Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Our commitment to human rights is reflected in this Human Rights Charter (‘HRC’ or ‘this Charter’), the core values of our business, and is governed by our Code of Business Conduct and Group Policies and Authorities. [....] Our commitment extends to all stakeholders affected by our business activities and relationships, including; workers in our operations and supply chains, counterparties and communities surrounding our operations. [...] Eradicating any form of exploitation, forced or bonded labour [...] Respecting Freedom of Association [...] not tolerating any form of discrimination [...] Eradicating child labour in our supply chain"
        • Inclusion of small-scale farmers
          Yes
          2/2
          Inclusion of small-scale farmers
          Yes
          2/2
          How many smallholders do they support, and what percentage does this represent in terms of their sourcing from smallholders?: 61,719 +

          What is the nature of that support?: Certification; Technical assistance/support
          "It is not our policy to suspend smallholders. Working with smallholders needs a different approach and dedicated programmes to help build their capacity. We work actively in partnership with governments to lift smallholders to a certifiable standard of sustainability, so they can make their living in a way that does not damage the forest." [...] "We currently work with smallholders in our supply chains across Papua New Guinea, Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia. We take a localised approach to meet the needs of communities in each of the geographical landscapes we operate in. [...] Total number of smallholders [...] 61,719"; "For us to contribute to the SDG to end poverty and hunger, and spur economic growth, it is vital for us to assure the viability of small farms in our supply chain. We understand that smallholders face numerous challenges in production. Too often, they simply lack the resources to produce palm oil sustainably. As of 2017, less than 1% of independent smallholders’ farms in Indonesia were certified as sustainable by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO)2. In Malaysia, only 643 smallholders are certified to RSPO standards"
        • Gender equality in the supply chain
          Commitment to address gender related labour rights including discrimination and harassment
          1/2
          Gender equality in the supply chain
          Commitment to address gender related labour rights including discrimination and harassment
          0.5/2
          “Promoting diversity and inclusion by providing equal opportunities and not tolerating any form of discrimination on the grounds of ethnic origin, caste, national origin, religion, disability, gender"
        • Commitment to remediation
          Yes, and until those open harms are remediated the company ceases operations on/sourcing from those operations
          1/1
          Commitment to remediation
          Yes, and until those open harms are remediated the company ceases operations on/sourcing from those operations
          1/1
          What does the commitment cover?: Environmental harm
          "At Sime Darby Plantation, we want to draw the line on deforestation and the practices that contribute to it. Therefore, in the event of a violation of NDPE standards, we will notify that supplier of our requirement that they commit to: • Stop work immediately on the affected land. • Develop a plan for remediating the damaged forest. • Develop a programme to improve their ongoing operational practices to meet NDPE standards. If the supplier concerned is unwilling to make these commitments, it is our policy to suspend them. Once a supplier has been suspended, purchases will not resume until our strict conditions are met."
        • Commitment to ensure Free, Prior and Informed Consent
          Yes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions
          2/3
          Commitment to ensure Free, Prior and Informed Consent
          Yes, the company commits to test for FPIC prior to acquiring new interests, developments, or expansions
          2/3
          How far back in the supply chain does this commitment apply?: NA
          "Local community engagement and partnership is fundamental to the success of our plantations. We actively engage with local community leaders and members prior to any land development by obtaining the Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of communities. This ensures project-affected communities are well informed and have the right to customary, user and traditional land. We are guided at all times by effective conflict resolution frameworks through social impact assessments and periodic stakeholder consultations that are independently assessed before and during our operations. . We are also acutely aware that the introduction of the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach introduces a new dimension to this ongoing FPIC process as we explain to communities why we cannot develop on their land and the importance of forest and habitat conservation"
        • Commitment to resolve land conflicts
          Yes
          3/3
          Commitment to resolve land conflicts
          Yes
          3/3
          "Local community engagement and partnership is fundamental to the success of our plantations. We actively engage with local community leaders and members prior to any land development by obtaining the Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of communities. This ensures project-affected communities are well informed and have the right to customary, user and traditional land. We are guided at all times by effective conflict resolution frameworks through social impact assessments and periodic stakeholder consultations that are independently assessed before and during our operations. . We are also acutely aware that the introduction of the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach introduces a new dimension to this ongoing FPIC process as we explain to communities why we cannot develop on their land and the importance of forest and habitat conservation" [...] "We actively engage with local community leaders and members before any land development to obtain Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) from communities. This approach ensures that communities impacted by our projects are well informed and that we have obtained permission from landowners who hold legal and customary rights. Our actions are informed by effective conflict resolution frameworks based upon social impact assessments and periodic stakeholder consultations carried out by independent third parties. All our operations conduct regular formal and informal engagements with all local stakeholders, especially at those locations where communities are most affected by our projects."
        • Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threats
          No
          0/3
      • Implementation and Reporting
        30/56
        • Reporting volumes against commitments
          Unclear proportion of compliant commodity volume disclosed
          1/3
          Reporting volumes against commitments
          Unclear proportion of compliant commodity volume disclosed
          0.5/3
          How many hectares of deforestation and/or conversion have occurred since the commitment cut-off date on land owned, controlled, or managed by the company?: NA

          What is the compliant volume?: 99%

          How many hectares of deforestation and/or conversion have occurred since the commitment cut-off date in the operations of the company's direct or indirect suppliers?: NA

          Does the company report on the degree of compliance/progress with commitments, disaggregated by relevant factors such as origin or supply chain stage?: No

          What is the non-certified/non-compliant volume?: 1%

          What is the volume with unknown deforestation/conversion risk? Disaggregated by product type or use as relevant.: NA

          What is the proportion of total commodity volume sourced with known deforestation/conversion risk?: NA

          How many hectares of land owned, controlled or managed is certified?: NA

          How much of this downstream deforestation is in protected areas, primary forests, intact forest landscapes, and/or peatlands?: NA

          What is the certified volume?: 99%

          How much of this upstream deforestation is in protected areas, primary forests, intact forest landscapes, and/or peatlands?: NA
          "As of September 2019, 95% of all the raw materials processed by our refineries and palm kernel crushers globally are traceable to mill [...] 94% of our directly supplied FFB are traceable to plantations. [...] Sime Darby Oils - Total Traceability to Mill 95%, Total Traceability to Plantation 53%. Breakdown by raw material: CFO 100% Traceable to Mill, 47% Traceable to plantation. CPKO 74% Traceable to mill, 43% Traceable to plantation. Palm Kernel 100% Traceable to mill, 66% Traceable to plantation. Refined kernel 70% Traceable to mill, 49% traceable to plantation"
        • Reporting is independently verified
          Yes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme
          0/2
          Reporting is independently verified
          Yes, using a third-party verification scheme or certification scheme
          0/2
          Which tools, approaches, third-party verification, including certification, schemes are used?: RSPO

          Which processes or groups does the company use for third party verification?: RSPO

          What percent of the company's supply volume is verified using company verification systems?: 99%

          What methods are used for verification?: RSPO

          For what percent of the company's supply volume is third-party verification of performance relative to commitments conducted?: NA

          Is the performance of compliance of some suppliers, sources, or origins not verified, and if so why not?: NA
          "We have a long history of operating sustainably – we have worked hard over the years to ensure that SDP is 99% certified to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) standards"
        • Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
          Yes, required
          3/3
          Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
          Yes, required
          3/3
          "In this revision we have further strengthened our position and commitments towards no deforestation, no new development on peat and no exploitation. These commitments are also extended to include actors within our supply chain and communities surrounding and affected by our operations." ; "3.2.1 Eliminating deforestation⁴ and conversion⁵ of other natural ecosystems⁶ in our operations and supply chain." [...] "Sime Darby Plantation and Sime Darby Oils are jointly committed to No Deforestation, No Peat and No Exploitation (NDPE) and today our own operations deliver to standards that go beyond those commitments. Our expectations of third-party suppliers are clear: we require them to meet NDPE standards as well."
        • Deforestation cut off date
          No
          0/2
        • Collaborative actions
          Yes
          2/2
          Collaborative actions
          Yes
          2/2
          What is the nature of that participation?: Attending & contributing to meetings; Providing support/ advice/ experience/ expertise

          What initiatives does the company participate in?: Conservation International and Sime Darby Plantation Berhad (SDP) partnership
          "Conservation International and Sime Darby Plantation Berhad (SDP) today announced a partnership to help map a sustainable future for one of the world’s most important and debated commodities: palm oil.The collaboration between the global nonprofit organization and the Malaysia-based company — the world’s largest producer of certified sustainable palm oil — aims to build on SDP’s reputation as a leader in sustainability in an effort to transform the palm oil sector. [...]The partnership with Conservation International comes on the heels of SDP’s recently launched traceability initiative, Crosscheck, the first of its kind for the industry. An open access, online tool, Crosscheck is a major step forward in the Company’s efforts to achieve a supply chain that is free of deforestation and violations of other sustainable practices."
        • Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land use
          No
          0/2
        • Risk assessments for forest risk
          Yes
          2/2
          Risk assessments for forest risk
          Yes
          2/2
          How frequently are assessments conducted?: NA

          For what percentage of material produced or sourced by the company has forest risk been assessed?: na
          OVERVIEWMonitoring risk within the supply chain.We use a combination of internal and external evaluation methods to assess third-party and SDP-owned suppliers for the risk of deforestation and peat clearance. These methods include desktop analyses, due diligence on potential and existing suppliers’ information, and external monitoring initiatives to visually map risk areas in our supply chain.SDP is alerted on any potential deforestation through satellite monitoring detection systems, such as Earthqualizer’s platform (carried out in partnership with Aidenvironment) and Radar Alerts for Detecting Deforestation (RADD).
        • Operations assessed to comply with law
          No
          0/2
        • Accessible grievance mechanism
          Yes, and published details of any grievances within the last two years (2019-2021)
          4/4
          Accessible grievance mechanism
          Yes, and published details of any grievances within the last two years (2019-2021)
          4/4
          What is the nature of the grievance mechanism used by the company?: Own mechanism
          "From 2015 to 2021, a total of 80 cases against third-party suppliers were filed in our Supplier Grievance Register. Most of these cases are related to indirect suppliers who supply SDP via traders. As of December 2021, we have resolved 60% of these cases. We are monitoring and engaging with suppliers involved in 13% of these cases, and a further 6% are still under investigation. [...] Our grievance register can be found on our Responsible Sourcing page, under Supplier Risk Assessment" [...] "Within Sime Darby, there are firmly established grievance procedures and whistle blowing channels5 which are available to all of our employees and external parties. We commit to investigate all violations of this Charter. [...] 5 GCO Whistleblowing Unit Email: whistleblowing@simedarby.com; Toll Free Numbers (Malaysian Office Hours; GMT +8 Hours): Malaysia - 1 800 88 8880; Indonesia - 001 803 60 1932; South Africa - 0 800 983 641; The Netherlands - 0800 022 9604; Other Countries - 800 8008 8000; Hotline at: (6019)2688295."
        • Report volumes of commodity
          Reporting total volume
          3/3
          Report volumes of commodity
          Reporting total volume
          3/3
          What is the non-DCF commodity volume sourced from known production areas, and proportion of total supply chain volume this represents?: NA

          What product types/sectors is this in?: Oils

          Reporting non-certified/non-compliant volume: NA

          Reporting certified/compliant volume: 99.36%

          Total volume: 2,786,569 tonnes
          In their 2020 ACOP report: "Total Crude Palm Oil produced [...] 2362568.0 tonnes [...] Total CSPK sold [...] 424001.0 tonnes."
        • Upstream: Monitor compliance with human rights
          No
          0/5
        • Compliance of company-owned operations
          Yes, company publishes details of the process for addressing conflicts related to customary rights to land, resources, and territory in its own operations and/or supply chain
          3/5
          Compliance of company-owned operations
          Yes, company publishes details of the process for addressing conflicts related to customary rights to land, resources, and territory in its own operations and/or supply chain
          2.5/5
          What details does the company publish on its land conflict policy?: Other information

          If other land policy details, specify: Sime Darby outline their engagement and conflict resolution framework applied at locations where communities are affected by projects as part of their land conflict policy
          "Local community engagement and partnership is fundamental to the success of our plantations. We actively engage with local community leaders and members prior to any land development by obtaining the Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of communities. This ensures project-affected communities are well informed and have the right to customary, user and traditional land. We are guided at all times by effective conflict resolution frameworks through social impact assessments and periodic stakeholder consultations that are independently assessed before and during our operations. We are also acutely aware that the introduction of the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach introduces a new dimension to this ongoing FPIC process as we explain to communities why we cannot develop on their land and the importance of forest and habitat conservation" [...] "We actively engage with local community leaders and members before any land development to obtain Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) from communities. This approach ensures that communities impacted by our projects are well informed and that we have obtained permission from landowners who hold legal and customary rights. Our actions are informed by effective conflict resolution frameworks based upon social impact assessments and periodic stakeholder consultations carried out by independent third parties. All our operations conduct regular formal and informal engagements with all local stakeholders, especially at those locations where communities are most affected by our projects."
        • Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisition
          Yes
          4/4
          Upstream: Impact assessments for land development/acquisition
          Yes
          4/4
          How does the company remedy adverse social and environmental impacts linked to their operations and/or supply chains?: NA

          For what percentage of production units has an ESIA been carried out as part of the land use planning process?: 100%
          "As its standard operating procedure, SDPL undertakes Social & Environmental Impact Assessments (SEIA) before any development begins. SDPL will only start developing land after Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) has been obtained from the local communities. This is in keeping with Sime Darby Plantation's own internal policies, the FPIC guidelines under the New Planting Procedures (NPP) of the RSPO and Article 32 of UN Declaration of Rights of Indigenous People. " [...] "As a founding member of the RSPO, Sime Darby Plantation has adopted the industry’s best practices in its Upstream and Downstream operations, throughout the entire supply chain. With this focus, the Division is committed to ensuring strict Social & Environmental Impact Assessments (SEIA) standards and avoidance of High Conservation Value (HCV) areas in pursuing the development of any potential area for its plantation."
        • Upstream: Reporting production/processing locations
          Reports location of certified land holdings; Reports location of land holdings under conservation; Reports location of un-certified land holdings; Reports location of company-owned processing facilities
          4/4
          Upstream: Reporting production/processing locations
          Reports location of certified land holdings; Reports location of land holdings under conservation; Reports location of un-certified land holdings; Reports location of company-owned processing facilities
          4/4
          What is the total area (in ha) of natural ecosystem on land owned, managed, or controlled by the company?: NA

          What is the total area of land (in ha) that is available for future production, e.g. concessions?: NA

          What type of conservation designation and/or conservation status is used?: NA

          What is the volume of each forest risk commodity that the company produced/processed/sourced in the previous year from each national or subnational location?: NA

          What is the total area in production (in ha)?: NA

          For what percent are boundaries disclosed?: NA

          What is the total land area owned, managed, or controlled by the company for the forest risk commodity?: NA

          For what percent are point locations (of certified land holdings) disclosed?: 100%

          For what percent are boundaries (of holdings under conservation) disclosed?: NA

          For what percent are boundaries (of certified land holdings) disclosed?: NA

          From what sub-national jurisdiction(s) does the company source material?: NA

          In what country(ies) does the company operate and/or source material?: Indonesia, Malaysia, south America, south east Asia, South Africa

          In what jurisdiction(s)/subnational region does the company operate and/or source material?: NA

          What is the area, in hectares of production units, on which non-DCF commodities are produced or processed, by country and jurisdiction: NA

          For what percent are point locations (of holdings under conservation) disclosed?: NA

          What types of ecosystems are these?: NA

          For what percent are point locations (of land holdings and processing facilities) disclosed: 100%
          Sime Darby provides full disclosure of mills/plantations through it's portal/tool Cross Check - "At Sime Darby Plantation (SDP), we have long made a commitment towards creating a deforestation-free supply chain. We believe the frontier to halting deforestation is traceability and in 2019, we launched ‘Crosscheck’, an open source online traceability tool that is available for everyone.‘Crosscheck’ helps provide transparency by tracking supply back to its source, identifying where problems exist – and taking action that is clearly outlined in our 'Working with Suppliers to Draw the Line on Deforestation’ policy statement."
        • Downstream: Publishing supplier lists
          No
          0/4
          Downstream: Publishing supplier lists
          No
          0/4
          From what country(ies) does the company source material?: Malaysia, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands
        • Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processing
          Yes, using a third-party verification system
          4/4
          Upstream: Monitor compliance of production/processing
          Yes, using a third-party verification system
          4/4
          For what percentage of suppliers does the company use/rely on external mechanisms to monitor compliance?: NA

          How frequently is compliance assessed?: Annually

          What tools, processes, bodies carry out monitoring of the company's production or processing operations?: Independent audits

          If so, what jurisdictions and mechanisms does the company use?: Independent annual audits

          For what percentage of the commodity sourced by the company is deforestation/conversion monitored at the farm level on production units known to be in the company's supply chain?: NA

          For what percentage of production or primary processing operations that it owns, manages, or otherwise controls does the company use external processes or actors, such as certification, to monitor compliance?: NA

          Does the company use a jurisdictional monitoring mechanism?: No

          Does the company use a certification system?: No
          "The first requirement for reinstatement is that they immediately cease work on the affected land, preventing any further clearing for new plantings, and agreeing to the relevant HCV and HCS assessments to be conducted by external bodies. Following that, the steps to reinstatement in our supply chain that we are putting in place are as follows: Public acknowledgement of the clearing and the necessity for remediation. Development within 2 months of time-bound plans for the recovery of High Carbon Stock (HCS) and High Conservation Value (HCV) forests and/or peatland cleared, plus agreement not to use the area cleared for commercial production. Development within 2 months of NDPE policies and time-bound implementation plans for operational improvement to meet those standards, covering their group-wide operations. Independent annual audits of continued compliance"
        • Upstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
          No
          0/4
        • Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chain
          Yes, for its suppliers; Also for its suppliers production or primary processing operations in its supply chains
          3/4
          Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chain
          Yes, for its suppliers; Also for its suppliers production or primary processing operations in its supply chains
          3/4
          For what percentage of suppliers does the company use/rely on external mechanisms to monitor compliance?: NA

          For what percentage of the commodity sourced by the company is deforestation/conversion monitored at the farm level on production units known to be in the company's supply chain?: NA

          For what percent of suppliers does the company directly monitor compliance of production or processing operations?: NA

          How frequently is compliance assessed?: Annually

          How is compliance monitored?: Certification; Internal monitoring and verification systems

          What percentage of the company's supply chain volume does that represent?: 100%
          "The first requirement for reinstatement is that they immediately cease work on the affected land, preventing any further clearing for new plantings, and agreeing to the relevant HCV and HCS assessments to be conducted by external bodies. Following that, the steps to reinstatement in our supply chain that we are putting in place are as follows: Public acknowledgement of the clearing and the necessity for remediation. Development within 2 months of time-bound plans for the recovery of High Carbon Stock (HCS) and High Conservation Value (HCV) forests and/or peatland cleared, plus agreement not to use the area cleared for commercial production. Development within 2 months of NDPE policies and time-bound implementation plans for operational improvement to meet those standards, covering their group-wide operations. Independent annual audits of continued compliance" [...] "We commit to monitor our progress in implementing this Charter and to develop, where appropriate, performance indicators and other measurements that assist in determining our progress. [...] The commitments in this Charter are effective immediately for all of our palm oil operations, both upstream and downstream, including associated smallholders."
        • Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
          No
          0/4
        • Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
          Suspend suppliers, engage to bring into compliance, and reintroduce to the supply chain
          2/2
          Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
          Suspend suppliers, engage to bring into compliance, and reintroduce to the supply chain
          2/2
          Does the company commit to engage with rightsholders, Indigenous peoples and local communities when developing the implementation plan?: No

          Does the company engage non-compliant indirect suppliers in order to address and remedy non-compliance?: Yes

          Does the company work with the non-compliant supplier to develop an implementation plan to remedy associated harms or non-compliance?: Yes

          What criteria does the policy specify for blacklisting or exclusion?: Non compliance

          What type of support does the company offer to its suppliers to help them achieve compliance with commitments?: Constructive engagement, time-bound action plans, policy development
          At Sime Darby Plantation, we want to draw the line on deforestation and the practices that contribute to it. Therefore, in the event of a violation of NDPE standards, we will notify that supplier of our requirement that they commit to: • Stop work immediately on the affected land. • Develop a plan for remediating the damaged forest. • Develop a programme to improve their ongoing operational practices to meet NDPE standards. If the supplier concerned is unwilling to make these commitments, it is our policy to suspend them. Once a supplier has been suspended, purchases will not resume until our strict conditions are met. [...] At Sime Darby Plantation, we believe that in the event of suspension we need to provide the opportunity for that supplier to be reinstated. Constructive engagement has proved to be critical to systematically resolving issues and building the capacity of suppliers to improve their practices. Also simply suspending suppliers can have the unintended consequence of driving poor practice elsewhere into the system, making it less visible and harder to act on [...] Following that, the steps towards re-instatement in our supply chain are as follows: • Public acknowledgement of the clearing and the necessity for remediation. • Development within 2 months of time-bound plans for the recovery of High Carbon Stock (HCS) and High Conservation Value (HCV) forests and/or peatland cleared, plus agreement not to use the area cleared for commercial production. • Development within 2 months of NDPE policies and time-bound implementation plans for operational improvement to meet those standards, covering their group-wide operations. • Commitment to regular progress reports against our stepped Operational Improvement Programme, with third party verification. • Independent annual audits of continued compliance."
        • Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliers
          Yes, excluded
          1/2
          Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliers
          Yes, excluded
          1/2
          How many noncompliant producers or suppliers are engaged through improvement plans or other processes, and what percentage of the company's supply chain volume does that represent?: NA

          Does the company have a list of blacklisted or otherwise excluded suppliers or producers?: No
          "Sime Darby Plantation, the world’s largest palm oil planter, has suspended a supplier for failing to meet its environmental standards and identified 54 others as “high-risk” in Malaysia and Indonesia in recent months as it fights against deforestation." [...] "As of December 2021, SDP ceased purchasing from three direct suppliers due to non-conformance. Two of these three are no longer in our supply chain for violating our Draw the Line Policy. SDP is currently engaging with these suppliers to assess their progress against their NDPE commitments. If they meet our strict conditions, we may resume commercial relationships with them"
    • Pulp & Paper *
      7/90
      • Commitment Strength
        0/17
        • Commitment to protect priority forests
          0/9.5
          • Commitment details
            No commitment
            0/6
          • Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
            0/2
          • Target date
            0/1
          • Interim target date
            0/0.5
        • Commitment to a traceable supply chain
          0/7.5
          • Commitment details
            No traceability commitment
            0/4
          • Commitment applies to all regions, suppliers and operation
            0/2
          • Target date
            0/1
          • Interim target date
            0/0.5
      • Associated Human Rights Abuses
        3/17
        • Labour rights in the supply chain
          Yes
          3/3
          Labour rights in the supply chain
          Yes
          3/3
          How far back in the supply chain does this commitment apply?: NA

          Details of commitment: ILO; UNGP; UN Declaration for HR; Discrimination; Forced labour; Child labour; Freedom of association
          "At Sime Darby, we believe that businesses have a responsibility to respect, support and uphold fundamental human rights as expressed, amongst others, in the Universal Declaration for Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This is reflected in our business core values and governed by our Code of Business Conduct and Group Policies and Authorities [....] Our commitment extends to all persons within our sphere of influence, which includes all our employees, workers in our operations, counterparties1 and communities surrounding our operations. We are also committed to working with our counterparties and business partners2 to encourage them to uphold respect for human rights as outlined in our policies and to encourage them to have similar commitments within their own business practices. [...] The internationally recognized principles & standards including the International Labour Organization (ILO) core labour standards and relevant industry standards and protocols." [...] Respecting Freedom of Association [...] child labour [...] will not condone discrimination [...] eradicate any form of forced or bonded labour"
        • Inclusion of small-scale farmers
          No
          0/2
        • Gender equality in the supply chain
          No commitment
          0/2
        • Commitment to remediation
          No
          0/1
        • Commitment to ensure Free, Prior and Informed Consent
          No
          0/3
        • Commitment to resolve land conflicts
          No
          0/3
        • Zero-tolerance approach to violence and threats
          No
          0/3
      • Implementation and Reporting
        4/56
        • Reporting volumes against commitments
          0/3
        • Reporting is independently verified
          0/2
        • Suppliers aligned with deforestation commitments across supply chain
          No
          0/3
        • Deforestation cut off date
          No
          0/2
        • Collaborative actions
          No
          0/2
        • Jurisdictional approach focused on sustainable land use
          No
          0/2
        • Risk assessments for forest risk
          No
          0/2
        • Operations assessed to comply with law
          No
          0/2
        • Accessible grievance mechanism
          Yes, and published details of any grievances within the last two years (2019-2021)
          4/4
          Accessible grievance mechanism
          Yes, and published details of any grievances within the last two years (2019-2021)
          4/4
          What is the nature of the grievance mechanism used by the company?: Own mechanism

          Which issues does the grievance mechanism cover?: Social; Environmental
          "Our commitment extends to all persons within our sphere of influence, which includes all our employees, workers in our operations, counterparties1 and communities surrounding our operations ... Within Sime Darby, there are firmly established grievance procedures and whistle blowing channels5 which are available to all of our employees and external parties. We commit to investigate all violations of this Charter." Whistleblowing Unit Email: whistleblowing@simedarby.com Environmental grievances are published in the Supplier Grievances Register
        • Report volumes of commodity
          No reporting
          0/3
        • Upstream: Monitor compliance with human rights
          No
          0/5
        • Compliance of company-owned operations
          No
          0/5
        • Downstream: Publishing supplier lists
          No
          0/4
        • Downstream: Monitor compliance in supply chain
          No
          0/4
        • Downstream: Reporting hectares of deforestation
          No
          0/4
        • Downstream: Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
          No engagement or exclusion
          0/2
        • Downstream: Disclosure of non-compliant suppliers
          No disclosure
          0/2
  • * commodity scores for which a company is not a powerbroker are given half the weighting of other commodities in total scores

  • Commitment strength
    9/17
    Avg. score
  • Implementation and Reporting
    21/56
    Avg. score
  • Associated Human Rights Abuses
    9/17
    Avg. score

Profile

The Sime Darby Group is a Malaysian conglomerate involved in diverse industries, including logistics, industrial equipment, property and plantations. Sime Darby Plantation is the agribusiness arm of the group which has one of the largest landbanks globally among palm oil producers. It also produces products such as oleochemicals, fats, biodiesel and other derivatives. Sime Darby Bhd. is selected as a powerbroker for palm oil.

Sector
Industry sector 
Agricultural Products, Paper Packaging
Segments
Producer, Trader
HQ
HQ 
Malaysia
Company Type
Company type 
CO
Collective Commitments
Consumer Goods Forum member
New York Declaration on Forests signatory

How we assess the Forest 500

To ensure deforestation free supply chains, companies need to adopt and implement timebound and measurable policies for forest risk commodities.

All assessments use policies published on company websites, some links may have changed or been removed since the time of assessment.

Disclaimer

This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our terms and conditions for use of data presented on this site.

All assessments use policies published on company and financial institution websites, and while we endeavor to keep them updated some links may have changed or been removed since the time of assessment.

Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.