Skip to main content
Menu

A Global Canopy project

Forest 500

  • About
    • How do we identify the 500?
    • How do we rank the 500?
    • Supporters
    • FAQ
    • Contact
  • Rankings
    • Companies
    • Financial institutions
    • Jurisdictions
    • Other powerbrokers
  • Progress
    • Company Trends
    • Financial Institution Trends
    • Jurisdiction Trends
  • Blog
  • Reports

indigenous_peoples.png

Indigenous peoples

Indigenous peoples

Type 
Other

50 Other powerbrokers

All other powerbrokers should use their unique positions to enable and promote a rapid transition to a zero deforestation economy.

Profile 

The livelihoods of more than 1.6 billion people around the world depend on forests to some extent. In addition, around 350 million people live in or near dense forests, depending on them for subsistence and income, while almost 60 million indigenous people are wholly dependent on forests. Deforestation therefore poses a significant threat to indigenous peoples and numerous disputes have resulted from overlapping claims to land where concessions have been granted on land under the ownership or management of local communities or indigenous peoples. It is essential that the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities are upheld both in the face of agricultural developments and attempts to address tropical deforestation, with it being recognised that securing the rights of forest peoples is vital to halting tropical forest destruction. Furthermore, indigenous and community groups often hold a wealth of traditional knowledge that can contribute to conservation and management, for example related to how to deal with changing climate conditions and to different agricultural practices for managing and conserving forests. 

Over the years, with growing recognition of the importance of forests, there has been in a rise in the international indigenous rights movement.  Indigenous peoples and other members of civil society are increasingly forming organised grass-roots movements involved in the management and protection of conservation areas but also in demanding greater accountability from conservation actors. For example, Panama’s National Coordinating Body of Indigenous Peoples (COONAPIP) pulled out of the UN-REDD Programme in Panama due to concerns over a lack of consultation with indigenous peoples throughout programme implementation. Indigenous engagement at the international policy level has increased and indigenous peoples’ organisations have influenced the development of policy processes in both the United Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Having said this, indigenous participation and influence in such discussions remains an issue with these groups limited in their ability to shape policy decisions due to their non-governmental designation in the policy arena.  

Disclaimer

This assessment has been carried out following the methodology developed for the Forest 500 project, available here. Please see our disclaimer applicable to all information contained within this site and our citation guidance for advice on how to cite data presented here or elsewhere on this site.

Please contact us with any concerns or feedback about this or other assessments included in the Forest 500.

Global Canopy Programme (GCP)

About this site

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy/cookie notice
  • Site credits

About us

  • Who is Global Canopy?
  • Citation and contributors

Follow us

  • Twitter

Get in touch

  • Contact us
Copyright © Global Canopy 2019. All rights reserved.
  • About
    • How do we identify the 500?
    • How do we rank the 500?
    • Supporters
    • FAQ
    • Contact
  • Rankings
    • Companies
    • Financial institutions
    • Jurisdictions
    • Other powerbrokers
  • Progress
    • Company Trends
    • Financial Institution Trends
    • Jurisdiction Trends
  • Blog
  • Reports